Skip to main content

Security report for smoobu.com

Smoobu.com · Hospitality · Germany

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Smoobu.com is a medium-sized technology company specializing in vacation rental management software. Their all-in-one SaaS platform offers a Channel Manager, Property Management System, Booking Engine, Guest Communication tools, Dynamic Pricing, and Website Builder, targeting vacation rental property owners and managers. The company positions itself as a comprehensive solution integrating with major booking platforms like Airbnb, Booking.com, and Expedia. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern JavaScript libraries and performance optimizations such as WP Rocket and lazy loading. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly, with a professional design and clear navigation. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks explicit security headers and published privacy or terms pages. WHOIS data is unavailable, which slightly reduces trust but the professional web presence and social media links support legitimacy. Overall, the site scores well on content quality, technical implementation, and business credibility, with room for improvement in privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of smoobu.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching smoobu.com

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
70
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention smoobu.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
2,700
Employees
6
Customers
2,690
Third parties
4
Weak passwords
10%

Latest record dated 2026-01-12 · 7 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for smoobu.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –smoobu.com2026-01-12
  • –smoobu.com2025-07-31
  • –www.smoobu.com2025-07-30
  • –www.smoobu.com2025-07-20
  • –dev.smoobu.com2025-06-12

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Smoobu operates in the hospitality and real estate sectors, providing software solutions for short-term rental management. Their business model is SaaS, generating revenue through subscriptions and offering a 14-day free trial to attract users. The company targets vacation rental owners, boutique hotels, bed and breakfasts, and similar accommodations. Partnerships with industry leaders like Airbnb and Booking.com enhance their market position. The website content and structure indicate a focus on user experience and direct bookings growth. The presence of multiple language versions suggests an international customer base. Marketing efforts include tracking pixels and retargeting via Google Tag Manager and Reddit Pixel. The company maintains active social media channels and a support center, indicating a mature customer engagement strategy.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent mechanisms, indicating awareness of privacy and security requirements. However, no explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are recommended to harden the site against common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found, and no direct contact channels for security incidents are published. The absence of WHOIS data reduces transparency but may be due to privacy protection or recent registration. Overall, the security posture is moderate with good baseline protections but lacking advanced security practices and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy pages to improve privacy compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement and configure security headers such as CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance security posture.
  3. Provide explicit contact information for security incidents and consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file.
  4. Improve accessibility features to meet higher standards and enhance user experience for all visitors.
  5. Increase transparency by ensuring WHOIS data is available or providing company registration details on the website.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Smoobu.com
Description
Simplify your short-term rental business with our Channel Manager, Property Management System (PMS), Guest Communication, and more!
Key services
Channel Manager, Property Management System, Booking Engine, Guest Communication, Dynamic Pricing, Website Builder, Account Access, Statistics
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, WP Rocket, AJAX Search, Swiper.js
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google Tag Manager
  • Cookie consent mechanism present

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Snowplow (conditional)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Reddit Pixel
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well structured
  2. Content is focused on vacation rental management software
  3. Multiple language versions available
  4. No explicit privacy or cookie policy pages found in provided content
  5. Contact phone number found in structured data but no email addresses publicly visible
  6. Use of modern web technologies and performance optimizations
  7. Presence of tracking and marketing scripts with cookie consent mechanism
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found
  9. No WHOIS data available, possibly due to privacy or new registration
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with modern JavaScript libraries including Swiper.js for UI components and AJAX Search for search functionality. Performance optimizations include WP Rocket for caching and lazy loading of images and scripts. The site uses Google Tag Manager and Reddit Pixel for analytics and marketing. The design is responsive and mobile-friendly with good SEO metadata including Open Graph tags and JSON-LD structured data for organization and webpage. No hosting provider or CDN information was explicitly detected. The site demonstrates a modern and well-maintained technical infrastructure with minor gaps in security headers and privacy documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 74/100Medium28 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with smoobu.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review smoobu.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.