Skip to main content

Security report for smileconseil.com

Smile Conseil · Media · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Smile Conseil is a creative agency founded in 2016, focused on collaborating with major brands and web talents in the new pop culture space. The website showcases their key services including influence, production, events, and a 360-degree approach to campaigns. The site is built on Webflow and uses modern JavaScript libraries such as GSAP, Lenis, and Splide.js to deliver a visually engaging and interactive user experience. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and ownership verification. Security posture is weak due to lack of security headers and privacy policies, and no contact information is provided for direct communication or incident response. Overall, while the site is professionally designed and content-rich, the lack of transparency and security best practices presents risks that should be addressed.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, LinkedIn, YouTube, Cloudflare

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching smileconseil.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
60
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a niche creative movement within the media sector, targeting brands seeking to leverage new pop culture and web talents for marketing campaigns. Their business model revolves around creative collaborations and production services. The website indicates a small-sized operation with a focus on quality and branding consistency. The lack of explicit business contact details and absence of privacy and security policies may impact trust and limit business growth opportunities. The use of Google Tag Manager suggests some level of marketing analytics, but privacy compliance is minimal. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the domain or website content.

Security posture

The security maturity of the website is low. There is no evidence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options, and SSL configuration details are not provided. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations. No incident response or security contact information is available, which could delay response to security incidents. The use of third-party libraries is modern but requires regular vulnerability assessments. Overall, the site lacks critical security controls and transparency, increasing risk exposure.

Recommendations

  1. Register and verify domain WHOIS information to establish legitimacy and trust.
  2. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users.
  3. Add security headers and enforce HTTPS with strong SSL/TLS configuration.
  4. Provide clear contact information including security and incident response contacts.
  5. Conduct regular security audits of third-party libraries and website infrastructure.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Smile Conseil
Description
Smile Conseil. Créée en 2016, Smile Conseil est un mouvement créatif porté par des gens issus de la nouvelle pop culture collaborant avec les plus grandes marques pour divertir et mettre en valeurs les talents du web.
Key services
Influence, Production, Évènements, Smile 360
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow, GSAP, Lenis, Splide.js, jQuery, Swiper
Platforms
Webflow
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a creative agency site built on Webflow with modern JS libraries
  2. No WHOIS registration data found, domain may be unregistered or WHOIS server not responding
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on site
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found
  5. Site uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking
  6. No security headers detected in provided data
  7. No security or incident response information found
  8. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences
  9. Good design and user experience with animated slider and interactive menu
Technical notes

Notes

The website leverages Webflow CMS and modern JavaScript libraries such as GSAP for animations, Lenis for smooth scrolling, and Splide.js for carousels. The design is responsive and visually appealing with good user experience. However, performance is moderate likely due to heavy animations and external dependencies. Accessibility features are basic and SEO optimization is minimal with standard meta tags but no structured data like JSON-LD detected. Hosting provider is not explicitly identified. The site uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking, but no advanced privacy controls or consent mechanisms are implemented.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with smileconseil.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review smileconseil.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.