Skip to main content

Security report for smeceressils.lv

Hospitality · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website represents a local sports and recreational facility named "Smeceres sils" located in Latvia. It offers various outdoor sports services including roller and moto tracks, bicycle and roller ski rentals, and hosts sports competitions. The site targets sports enthusiasts and local visitors interested in outdoor activities. The business model is focused on facility usage and event hosting, positioning itself as a regional sports and recreation hub. Technically, the website uses a traditional jQuery-based stack with additional UI and timepicker plugins. It includes a cookie consent mechanism via PrivacyWire, indicating some level of privacy compliance. However, there is no evidence of modern frameworks or CMS platforms, and performance and mobile optimization are basic. The site lacks visible security headers and HTTPS status is unknown, which poses potential security risks. Security posture is moderate with cookie consent implemented but missing critical security headers and no visible HTTPS confirmation. No incident response or security policy information is available. The WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain trust analysis. Contact information and privacy policies are present, supporting basic compliance and business credibility. Overall, the website is functional and provides relevant content for its audience but would benefit from improved security measures, HTTPS implementation, and enhanced technical modernization to increase trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching smeceressils.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
45
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Smeceres sils operates as a small local sports and recreation facility in Latvia, focusing on outdoor sports and event hosting. Its competitive advantage lies in providing specialized sports tracks and rental services in the Madona region. The business model relies on facility usage fees and event participation. The website indicates a modest digital presence with limited marketing and analytics tools, suggesting a focus on local clientele rather than broad online expansion. Partnerships appear limited to local domains such as madona.lv. Growth indicators and parent or subsidiary relationships are not evident. The company maintains basic contact and privacy information, supporting operational transparency within its market niche.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is basic. The presence of a cookie consent banner indicates awareness of privacy regulations. However, the absence of HTTPS confirmation and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are published, which limits preparedness for security incidents. The use of older JavaScript libraries without visible update mechanisms may expose the site to known vulnerabilities. Compliance with GDPR appears addressed at a basic level through privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the security culture appears minimal and would benefit from formalized policies and technical improvements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure all website traffic.
  2. Add essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Regularly update all JavaScript libraries and dependencies to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  5. Enhance mobile optimization and accessibility to improve user experience and compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Sporta un atpūtas bāze offering sports and recreational facilities including roller and moto tracks, bicycle and roller ski rentals, and hosting competitions.
Key services
Roller track, Moto track, Bicycle and roller ski rental, Hosting sports competitions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, jQuery UI, jQuery Timepicker, jQuery Fancybox, PrivacyWire cookie consent
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and content is complete.
  2. No WAF or security blocking detected.
  3. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present and implemented.
  5. Contact information is clearly provided.
  6. No security headers detected in provided data.
  7. No HTTPS status available; SSL configuration unknown.
  8. Website uses common JavaScript libraries but no modern frameworks detected.
  9. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  10. No forms detected on the main page content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a traditional jQuery-based stack with additional UI and timepicker plugins. It lacks modern frameworks or CMS platforms, indicating a potentially outdated technical infrastructure. Performance is moderate with basic mobile responsiveness and accessibility features. SEO optimization is minimal with standard meta tags but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. Hosting provider and SSL configuration details are not available, limiting assessment of infrastructure quality. The site uses PrivacyWire for cookie consent, indicating some privacy compliance. Technical debt is suggested by the use of older libraries and lack of modern web standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with smeceressils.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review smeceressils.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.