Skip to main content

Security report for slovenia-explorer.com

Slovenia Explorer · Hospitality · Slovenia

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Slovenia Explorer is a specialized tour operator and official Gray Line Slovenia® licensee offering a variety of tours including small group day trips, private day trips, multi-day tours, and tailor-made experiences focused on Slovenia's key attractions such as Lake Bled, Postojna Cave, and Ljubljana. The company targets tourists seeking authentic and organized travel experiences in Slovenia. The website is professionally designed with clear navigation, mobile optimization, and rich structured data enhancing user experience and SEO. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies including Google Fonts, Typekit, Google Maps API, and Google Analytics with consent management, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is good with HTTPS and service worker usage, but lacks some security headers and formal privacy and terms policies, which are critical for compliance and trust. The WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which raises concerns about domain legitimacy despite the professional appearance of the site. Overall, the business appears credible and well-positioned in the hospitality sector, but domain registration transparency and privacy compliance need improvement.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  4. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching slovenia-explorer.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
40
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
80
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Slovenia Explorer operates in the hospitality sector as a niche tour operator with official licensing from Gray Line Slovenia®, giving it a competitive advantage and trust signal. Its business model revolves around curated tours catering to international tourists interested in Slovenia's cultural and natural landmarks. The company offers a range of services from scheduled group tours to bespoke private tours, indicating flexibility and customer-centric offerings. The website content and branding are consistent and professional, supporting a strong market position. However, the lack of visible company registration details and missing WHOIS data could impact trust for some customers. The company leverages digital marketing tools like Google Analytics and consent management but lacks comprehensive privacy and security disclosures, which are increasingly important for European markets under GDPR. Strategic partnerships or parent/subsidiary relationships are not evident from the data.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enforced and use of Google Consent Mode to manage user privacy preferences. The presence of a service worker indicates progressive web app capabilities, enhancing security and performance. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options is a notable gap that could expose the site to clickjacking, MIME sniffing, and other web-based attacks. No evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries was found in the provided content. The site lacks published incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies, which are best practices for mature security programs. The missing WHOIS data and unclear domain registration status introduce an element of risk regarding domain ownership legitimacy. Overall, while no critical vulnerabilities are apparent, improvements in security headers and transparency are recommended.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact information to enhance security transparency.
  3. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen web security.
  4. Verify and update domain registration details to ensure WHOIS data is accurate and publicly available, improving legitimacy perception.
  5. Enhance cookie policy transparency and consent mechanisms to fully comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Slovenia Explorer
Description
Official Gray Line Slovenia® licensee offering top tours: Lake Bled, Postojna Cave, Ljubljana & more—authentic experiences by Slovenia Explorer.
Key services
Small Group Day Tours from Ljubljana, Private Day Trips, Multi-day Tours, Tailor-made Slovenia Tours
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Lenis smooth scrolling, Google Fonts, Typekit fonts, Google Maps API, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Service Worker (PWA support), FSLightbox (lightbox gallery), Custom CSS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Service worker registered
  • Google Consent Mode used with ad_storage denied and analytics_storage granted

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Google Consent Mode
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and structured data
  2. No privacy or cookie policy pages found despite cookie consent mechanism
  3. WHOIS data missing, raising domain legitimacy questions
  4. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information present
  5. Contact info limited to phone and address, no email found in visible content
  6. No social media links detected in provided HTML snippet
  7. Website uses modern web technologies and good SEO practices
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and performant tech stack including smooth scrolling libraries, Google Fonts, Adobe Typekit, Google Maps API, and Google Analytics with consent management. It supports progressive web app features via service workers, improving user experience and offline capabilities. The site is well-structured with semantic HTML and rich metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data for local business and organization, aiding SEO and discoverability. Performance is moderate with CDN usage for media assets. Mobile optimization and accessibility are good, with skip links and responsive design evident. However, the CMS or hosting provider is not identifiable from the data. There is room for improvement in security headers and privacy disclosures to reduce technical debt and compliance risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with slovenia-explorer.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review slovenia-explorer.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.