Skip to main content

Security report for sliptrickrecords.com

Sliptrick Records · Media · N/a

Partial score · DNS & email only

62/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Sliptrick Records operates as a niche record label and music distribution company, focusing on promoting artists and distributing music in CD and MP3 formats. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with good content quality targeted at music industry participants and fans. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using the Avada theme and several plugins, including YouTube Embed Plus Pro and Instagram Feed, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. However, the site lacks visible privacy and cookie policies, security headers, and explicit contact information, which are critical for compliance and trust. The security posture is weak due to missing security best practices and unclear SSL configuration. Overall, the site is functional and professional but requires improvements in privacy, security, and transparency to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

3 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
Not assessed
GDPR outside view
Not assessed

Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      SSL Certificate Expires Soon

      SSL certificate expires in 29 days

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration

      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates
  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sliptrickrecords.com

This scan found 13 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
20
Average
62

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Sliptrick Records positions itself as a specialized player in the media industry, focusing on record label services and music distribution. Its business model revolves around artist promotion and music sales, targeting a niche audience of music fans and industry professionals. The website content and structure suggest a small-sized company with consistent branding and a clear market focus. The use of WordPress and popular plugins indicates a cost-effective and scalable digital infrastructure. However, the absence of detailed business contact information and compliance documentation may limit its credibility and growth potential. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the provided data.

Security posture

The website currently exhibits a low security maturity level. There is no evidence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options, and SSL/TLS configuration details are unknown. The absence of privacy and cookie policies, as well as incident response contacts, indicates gaps in compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations. The use of third-party plugins and analytics services like Google Analytics introduces potential privacy risks if not properly managed. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content, but the lack of security best practices and transparency poses a moderate risk. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not visible.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a strong SSL/TLS configuration and verify it site-wide.
  2. Add and prominently display comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance.
  3. Deploy security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Publish clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for business and security incidents.
  5. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Sliptrick Records
Description
LATEST NEWS LATEST RELEASE Check out the latest official and lyrics videos from the Sliptrick Roster Check out the upcoming releases due out via Sliptrick Records on CD and MP3 Albums, EP's and singles throughout the history of Sliptrick
Key services
Record label services, Music distribution on CD and MP3, Promotion of artists and releases
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Avada Theme, jQuery, YouTube Embed Plus Pro Plugin, Instagram Feed Plugin
Frameworks
Avada
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress site using Avada theme and several plugins.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the provided content.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content.
  4. No security headers or advanced security configurations detected.
  5. Google Analytics is used for tracking.
  6. Content is focused on music record label and distribution.
  7. No signs of adult or explicit content.
  8. No visible forms or data collection fields in the provided HTML snippet.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using the Avada theme, which is a modern and popular framework. It leverages jQuery and plugins for embedding YouTube videos and Instagram feeds, enhancing multimedia content delivery. The site includes Google Analytics for user tracking. Performance appears moderate with standard plugin usage, but no advanced optimization or caching mechanisms were detected in the provided content. Mobile optimization is good, supported by responsive design elements. Accessibility features are basic, and SEO optimization is minimal with meta tags present but no advanced structured data or schema markup. Technical debt is moderate due to reliance on multiple plugins and lack of visible security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sliptrickrecords.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sliptrickrecords.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.