Skip to main content

Security report for sliachajniky.sk

Sliač Hájniky · Real Estate · Slovakia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Sliač Hájniky is a Slovak real estate project focused on new residential housing development. The website serves as an informational platform showcasing different housing units (Dom A, B, C, D) with sections for exterior, interior, and project details. The target audience is general consumers interested in purchasing new homes in the Sliač area. The business model revolves around property development and sales, positioning itself as a local real estate offering. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using the Divi theme and Smart Slider 3 plugin, with integration of Facebook Pixel for marketing tracking. The site is mobile optimized and has good SEO practices via Yoast SEO plugin, but lacks full analytics configuration. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but missing key security headers and no visible privacy or cookie policies, indicating compliance gaps. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security hardening.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sliachajniky.sk

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention sliachajniky.sk, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for sliachajniky.sk right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website represents a small-scale real estate development business targeting local Slovak customers. It leverages social media channels like Facebook and Instagram for marketing and brand presence. The business appears focused on residential housing projects with clear segmentation of different houses and their features. The lack of detailed company registration or contact information on the site limits transparency. The partnership with RabbitStudio for website creation indicates use of professional digital services. Growth potential depends on local market demand and improved digital marketing and compliance practices. No evidence of subsidiaries or parent companies was found.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS ensuring encrypted communication, which is a fundamental security measure. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. The use of Facebook Pixel without a cookie consent mechanism raises privacy compliance concerns under GDPR. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy is present, limiting transparency for security researchers. No contact emails or phone numbers are visible for incident reporting. The site does not expose sensitive data or show signs of vulnerable libraries in the HTML content. Overall, security maturity is moderate but requires improvements in headers, privacy compliance, and incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and display a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Configure Google Analytics properly or remove unused analytics plugins to avoid unnecessary data collection.
  4. Publish a security.txt file and provide clear incident response contact information for vulnerability reporting.
  5. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities and improve security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Sliač Hájniky
Description
Nové bývanie
Key services
residential housing development, property sales, project information dissemination
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 5.7.12, Divi Theme 4.9.6, Smart Slider 3 plugin, jQuery 3.5.1, Yoast SEO plugin 16.7, Facebook Pixel
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Facebook Pixel for tracking

Analytics and tracking

Services
Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a Slovak real estate project site for residential housing
  2. Content is in Slovak language with clear navigation and structured pages
  3. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps
  4. Use of Facebook Pixel for tracking without clear cookie consent
  5. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on main page
  6. Site uses WordPress with Divi theme and Smart Slider plugin
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
  8. No explicit security headers detected in HTML content
  9. No signs of WAF or blocking mechanisms
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a mature CMS platform (WordPress) with a popular commercial theme (Divi) and a well-known slider plugin (Smart Slider 3). The front-end uses jQuery and Google Fonts, with asynchronous loading of scripts to optimize performance. SEO is enhanced by Yoast SEO plugin with structured data in JSON-LD format. The site is mobile responsive and uses modern web standards. However, no advanced performance optimization techniques like caching or CDN usage were detected in the HTML content. The site lacks visible security headers and privacy compliance mechanisms. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical infrastructure is standard for small business websites but could benefit from security and privacy enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sliachajniky.sk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sliachajniky.sk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.