Skip to main content

Security report for skinbeautiful.co.uk

Skin Beautiful · Healthcare · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Skin Beautiful is a small UK-based healthcare service provider specializing in cosmetic laser and skin treatments such as tattoo removal, laser hair removal, cryotherapy, and skin rejuvenation. The company targets individuals in Bognor Regis and surrounding areas seeking professional skin care services. The website is built on WordPress using the Divi theme and includes modern technologies like jQuery and Google reCAPTCHA to enhance user experience and security. While the site is well-designed, mobile-optimized, and SEO-friendly, it lacks explicit privacy and terms of service pages, which are important for compliance and user trust. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS and CAPTCHA usage, but security headers and incident response information are missing. WHOIS data for the domain could not be retrieved due to querying the www subdomain, limiting domain trust verification. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy front for a local cosmetic treatment business but would benefit from improved privacy compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Facebook, Twitter, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching skinbeautiful.co.uk

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
27
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention skinbeautiful.co.uk, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for skinbeautiful.co.uk right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the healthcare sector focusing on cosmetic laser and skin treatments. It has a clear local market positioning with over 10 years of experience claimed. The business model is direct-to-consumer service provision. Key services include laser tattoo removal, laser hair removal, cryotherapy, and skin rejuvenation treatments. The website supports business credibility with social media presence and clear contact information. There is no evidence of parent or subsidiary companies. Marketing efforts appear organic with SEO and social media engagement. The absence of detailed business registration or certification information limits deeper business intelligence insights.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA, indicating basic security awareness. However, it lacks visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which could hinder timely security issue reporting and resolution. The absence of privacy and cookie policies reduces GDPR compliance confidence. No known vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved with standard security best practices and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance web security.
  3. Provide clear incident response and vulnerability disclosure contact information to facilitate security issue reporting.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct periodic security training for staff to foster a security-aware culture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Skin Beautiful
Description
Skin Beautiful specialises in laser hair removal, tattoo removal, and various skin treatments in Bognor Regis and surrounding areas.
Key services
Laser Tattoo Removal, Laser Hair Removal, Laser Skin Rejuvenation, Cryotherapy, Chemical Peels, Collagen Induction Therapy and Microneedling, Vascular Thread / Spider Vein Laser Removal, Permanent Makeup Removal
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Divi Theme, jQuery, Yoast SEO, Google Fonts, reCAPTCHA
Frameworks
Divi Builder
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for forms

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google reCAPTCHA
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS lookup failed due to querying www subdomain instead of base domain.
  3. Website uses HTTPS and modern WordPress technologies.
  4. Contact information is clearly displayed including phone numbers and email.
  5. No explicit privacy or terms of service pages found.
  6. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented.
  7. Social media presence on Facebook, Twitter (X), and Instagram.
  8. No visible security policy or incident response information.
  9. No certifications or vulnerability disclosure policies found.
  10. Content is relevant to cosmetic laser and skin treatments.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress CMS with the Divi theme and builder, supported by jQuery and Google Fonts. SEO is enhanced by Yoast SEO plugin. The site loads scripts asynchronously and uses Google reCAPTCHA for form protection. Performance is moderate with some optimization opportunities. Mobile responsiveness is good, but accessibility is basic and could be improved. Hosting provider details are not evident from the content. The site lacks advanced security headers and explicit privacy compliance mechanisms. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and functional but could benefit from enhanced security and compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with skinbeautiful.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review skinbeautiful.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.