Skip to main content

Security report for skilodgejaktman.com

Ski Lodge Jaktman · Hospitality · Austria

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

47/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ski Lodge Jaktman is a small hospitality business located in Bad Gastein, Austria, specializing in ski holiday accommodation and related tourism services. The website positions itself strongly in the local market, boasting the number one ranking on Tripadvisor for eight consecutive years, which indicates a solid reputation and customer satisfaction. The business offers rooms, apartments, ski equipment rental discounts, and packages for skiing and other alpine activities, targeting winter sports enthusiasts and tourists visiting the Gastein Valley. Technically, the website is hosted on IONOS SE infrastructure using the IONOS MyWebsite CMS platform. The site uses Apache server technology and includes JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and lightbox plugins for image galleries. However, the website lacks a valid SSL/TLS certificate and does not serve content over HTTPS, which is a critical security and trust issue. Performance is slow, and mobile optimization and accessibility are basic. SEO is also basic with some meta tags but no advanced structured data or JSON-LD. From a security perspective, the site has minimal security headers and no active HTTPS, which severely limits its security posture. The Content Security Policy is set to report-only mode, and the X-XSS-Protection header is disabled. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are published. The domain is mature and registered consistently with the business location, but the lack of HTTPS and privacy policies are significant compliance and security gaps. Overall, the website is functional and provides good business information and user experience but requires urgent improvements in security, privacy compliance, and technical modernization to enhance trust and protect user data.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
15/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching skilodgejaktman.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
35
Email security
50
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
15
Average
47

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Ski Lodge Jaktman operates in the hospitality sector, focusing on ski tourism in Austria's Gastein Valley. Its competitive advantage lies in its long-standing positive reputation on Tripadvisor and its specialized ski packages and local knowledge. The business model is direct accommodation rental with ancillary services such as ski equipment rental discounts and activity planning. The target customers are winter sports tourists and families seeking alpine vacations. The company appears to be small-sized with no public parent or subsidiary companies. Partnerships with local ski rental services and tourism platforms are evident. Growth indicators include consistent Tripadvisor recognition and multilingual website support. The business ecosystem is localized with trusted external links to regional service providers.

Security posture

The current security maturity level of the website is low due to the absence of HTTPS and a valid SSL certificate, which exposes users to risks such as data interception and man-in-the-middle attacks. Security headers are partially implemented but insufficient, with the X-XSS-Protection header disabled and Content Security Policy only in report-only mode. There are no published policies for incident response or vulnerability disclosure, indicating limited preparedness for security incidents. GDPR compliance is questionable due to missing privacy and cookie policies. The lack of DNSSEC and CAA records further reduces domain security. Overall, the security posture exposes the business and its customers to avoidable risks and undermines trust.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and properly configure a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire website immediately.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users about data handling.
  3. Enable and configure security headers such as HSTS, X-XSS-Protection, and enforce a strict Content Security Policy.
  4. Implement DNSSEC and CAA records to enhance domain security and prevent certificate mis-issuance.
  5. Develop and publish an incident response plan and vulnerability disclosure policy to improve security transparency and readiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the IONOS MyWebsite CMS platform and hosted by IONOS SE, using Apache as the web server. It employs JavaScript libraries including jQuery and lightbox plugins for enhanced user interaction. The site lacks modern security protocols, notably missing HTTPS and TLS support. Performance metrics are not available but inferred as slow due to chunked transfer encoding and lack of caching headers. SEO is basic with meta tags and Open Graph tags but no JSON-LD structured data. Mobile optimization is basic, and accessibility features are minimal. The technical debt includes outdated security practices and missing modern web standards, which could impact user trust and search engine ranking.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with skilodgejaktman.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review skilodgejaktman.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.