Skip to main content

Security report for skechers.com

Skechers · Retail · United States

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Skechers is a globally recognized footwear and apparel company specializing in lifestyle and athletic products for men, women, and children. The company operates a comprehensive e-commerce platform supported by a robust digital infrastructure, leveraging Salesforce Commerce Cloud and multiple marketing and analytics technologies. The website demonstrates a high level of professionalism, with clear navigation, consistent branding, and extensive product categorization. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement and multiple security best practices observed, though explicit security policies and incident response information are not publicly disclosed. Privacy compliance is well addressed with visible privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, the website reflects a mature, enterprise-level retail business with a strong market position and digital presence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching skechers.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
45
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention skechers.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
26,656
Employees
11
Customers
26,521
Third parties
124
Weak passwords
8%

Latest record dated 2026-05-25 · 18 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for skechers.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –skxfs.skechers.com2026-05-25
  • –skxfs.skechers.com2025-11-14
  • –skxfs.skechers.com2025-11-13
  • –skxfs.skechers.com2025-07-29
  • –skxfs.skechers.com2025-07-28

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Skechers holds a significant position in the retail footwear and apparel market, targeting a broad audience with a focus on comfort technology. The business model centers on direct-to-consumer sales via online and physical stores, supported by a loyalty rewards program. The company leverages extensive digital marketing and analytics tools to optimize customer engagement and sales. The presence of multiple international localized sites and social media channels indicates a global footprint. Despite the absence of public WHOIS data, the brand's established reputation and comprehensive online presence affirm its legitimacy and operational scale.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with strong SSL configuration and integrates various security-focused scripts and tracking mechanisms. Security headers are implied but not explicitly confirmed in the provided data. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of publicly available security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure programs suggests areas for improvement in transparency and readiness. The use of recaptcha for order lookup enhances protection against automated abuse. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from enhanced disclosure and formalized security governance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish explicit security headers and verify their implementation site-wide.
  2. Establish and publicize an incident response and vulnerability disclosure policy, including a security.txt file.
  3. Enhance transparency around data retention and privacy compliance details.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking pixels to minimize privacy risks.
  5. Consider publishing certifications or compliance attestations to strengthen trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Skechers USA
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Skechers
Description
Lifestyle and athletic footwear and apparel for men, women, and kids filled with innovative comfort technologies
Key services
Online retail of footwear, Apparel sales, Customer rewards program, Store locator and in-store pickup
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Monetate, TikTok Pixel, Bing Ads, Reddit Pixel, Tune, Quantum Metric, Demandware (Salesforce Commerce Cloud), WebFontLoader, Apple Pay JS, CQuotient
Frameworks
Bootstrap (implied by navbar classes), jQuery (implied by dropdown toggles)
Platforms
Salesforce Commerce Cloud
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security-focused scripts
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of recaptcha modal for order lookup

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Quantum Metric, Monetate, CQuotient
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Bing Ads, Reddit Ads
Tracking pixels
TikTok Pixel, Monetate, Quantum Metric, Tune, CQuotient
Marketing tools
Monetate, Curalate
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional e-commerce platform for Skechers brand
  2. Comprehensive navigation with detailed product categories
  3. Multiple tracking and marketing scripts integrated
  4. Strong branding and consistent design
  5. No signs of phishing or malware
  6. No WHOIS data available in raw output, possibly privacy protected or registrar data not accessible
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies found on main site
  8. Privacy and cookie policies present and appear compliant
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Salesforce Commerce Cloud, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries and frameworks such as Google Tag Manager, Monetate, and Quantum Metric for analytics and personalization. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility considerations. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts to improve user experience. The technical stack is mature and well-integrated, supporting a complex e-commerce environment. Opportunities exist to optimize loading times further and enhance accessibility features. The absence of explicit hosting provider information limits full infrastructure assessment.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with skechers.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review skechers.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.