Skip to main content

Security report for skardajumti.lv

Skārda jumti, SIA · Real Estate · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Skārda jumti, SIA is a Latvian small business specializing in roofing installation, metalwork, and related construction services with over 15 years of industry experience. The company targets private homeowners, public buildings, and industrial clients within Latvia, offering services such as roof assembly, inspection, metal product fabrication, and training. Their website is built on WordPress and uses common plugins like Contact Form 7 and Lightbox, reflecting a moderate level of digital maturity. The site is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and provides clear contact information and social media links, supporting business credibility. However, the absence of WHOIS data limits full verification of domain legitimacy.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Facebook, LinkedIn, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching skardajumti.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
30
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the real estate and manufacturing sectors, focusing on roofing and metal construction services. Their business model is service-oriented, relying on skilled labor and project execution. The website content and social media presence indicate a stable local market position with a focus on quality and customer trust, including a 3-year work guarantee. The lack of advanced marketing or analytics tools suggests a traditional approach to customer engagement. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website data.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and employs some security measures such as right-click protection on images. However, it uses an outdated jQuery version (1.12.4), which may expose it to known vulnerabilities. No HTTP security headers were detected, and there is no cookie consent mechanism, indicating gaps in GDPR compliance. The absence of a security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure reduces transparency and preparedness. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved significantly with updates and policy implementations.

Recommendations

  1. Update all JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to the latest secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  2. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner and improve privacy policy details to align with GDPR requirements and increase user trust.
  4. Develop and publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Regularly audit website plugins and dependencies for vulnerabilities and maintain timely updates to reduce security risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Skārda jumti, SIA
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Skārda jumti, SIA
Description
Uzņēmums ar vairāk nekā 15 gadu pieredzi jumtu izbūvē, piedāvājot jumtu montāžu, metināšanu, apsekošanu, fasāžu apdari un skārda izstrādājumus gan privātmājām, gan sabiedriskām un industriālām ēkām Latvijā.
Key services
Jumtu montāža, Objektu apsekošana, Apmācības un konsultācijas, Skārda izstrādājumi
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.12.4, WordPress 5.1.19, Lightbox plugin, Contact Form 7 plugin, Nivo Slider
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • Use of security plugins (Lightbox with right-click protection)

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info extracted.
  3. Website uses WordPress CMS with several common plugins.
  4. Contact information is clearly presented with company phone, email, and physical address.
  5. No privacy or cookie consent banners detected; privacy policy page exists but lacks strong GDPR indicators.
  6. No terms of service or security policy pages found.
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files found.
  8. No data protection officer contact information found.
  9. Website content is business-focused, safe, and appropriate for general audiences.
  10. Some outdated libraries (jQuery 1.12.4) may pose security risks.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 5.1.19 with plugins including Contact Form 7 and Lightbox, using jQuery 1.12.4. The site loads with moderate performance and is mobile-optimized with responsive design. SEO optimization is basic, with proper meta tags but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. Accessibility features are minimal but present. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site uses standard fonts from Google Fonts and includes social media integration. There is room for modernization, especially updating libraries and improving security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with skardajumti.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review skardajumti.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.