Skip to main content

Security report for skandlink.lv

Skandlink · Real Estate · Latvia

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Skandlink is a small Latvian company specializing in the design and construction of prefabricated wooden houses, including summer houses, tiny houses, row houses, and customized modular homes. Their business model focuses on providing environmentally friendly, customizable housing solutions with competitive pricing and a comprehensive design-to-delivery service. The company holds ISO 9001:2015 and ISO 14001:2015 certifications, enhancing their credibility in quality and environmental management. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies such as jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Google Maps API, providing a good user experience with mobile optimization and clear navigation. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and secure forms, though some security headers are missing and no explicit security policy or vulnerability disclosure is published. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and content-rich, though WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain registration trust assessment.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching skandlink.lv

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
88
DNS health
90
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
83
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Skandlink operates in the real estate sector focusing on prefabricated wooden housing solutions primarily targeting individual customers and B2B clients in the Baltic and Scandinavian regions. Their competitive advantage lies in customization, environmental sustainability, and a streamlined design and build process. The company leverages certifications and social proof to build trust. Revenue streams likely include design services, production, delivery, and assembly of wooden houses. The website indicates a growth-oriented approach with active news updates and project showcases. Partnerships include creditreports.lv for business verification. The company maintains a professional digital presence with social media engagement and marketing tools.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and secure contact forms including CSRF tokens. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces the overall security posture. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which could hinder timely handling of security issues. Privacy compliance is strong with GDPR-aligned policies and cookie consent. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. The security score is good but could be improved by implementing additional headers and publishing a security.txt file.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page and a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve transparency.
  3. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerabilities are introduced.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet compliance standards and improve user experience for all users.
  5. Maintain updated WHOIS information and consider publishing registrant details to improve domain trustworthiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Skandlink
Description
Skandlink designs and builds customized environmentally friendly prefabricated wooden houses including summer houses, tiny houses, row houses, and modular houses. They offer a design and build process covering concept development, architecture, production drawings, static calculation, production, delivery, and assembly.
Key services
Prefabricated wooden houses, Summer houses, Tiny houses, Row houses, Custom modular houses, Delivery and assembly
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.4.1, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google Maps API, Fancybox 3.5.7
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure contact forms with CSRF tokens
  • Cookie consent banner

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  3. Uses modern tracking and analytics tools.
  4. Has privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  5. Includes ISO certifications as trust indicators.
  6. No security.txt or explicit security policy page found.
  7. Contact information is comprehensive and clearly presented.
  8. No adult or questionable content detected.
  9. No visible security headers detected in provided data.
  10. Good mobile optimization and SEO practices observed.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and common technology stack including jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Google Maps API. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO practices including meta tags and canonical URLs. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary solution. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site uses secure HTTPS connections. Technical debt appears low, but improvements in accessibility and security headers are recommended to reduce risks and enhance compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with skandlink.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review skandlink.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.