Skip to main content

Security report for sisow.nl

Buckaroo B.V. · Finance · Netherlands

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in SSL/TLS.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Buckaroo B.V. is a well-established payment service provider based in the Netherlands, offering a broad range of payment solutions including online payment methods, pin terminals, omnichannel services, and enterprise subscription and credit management. The company targets businesses requiring integrated and flexible payment processing solutions and holds a strong market position in the Dutch and Benelux regions. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with comprehensive service offerings and clear navigation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sisow.nl

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
80
Email security
65
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Buckaroo operates primarily in the finance and technology sectors, providing SaaS and hardware payment solutions. Their business model focuses on enabling merchants to accept multiple payment methods seamlessly. The company leverages partnerships and regional sites to expand its market reach. The presence of PCI DSS certification and detailed privacy and cookie policies indicate a mature compliance posture. The website content and structure support a business-to-business audience with a focus on reliability and integration capabilities.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with good SSL configuration and implements multiple security headers to enhance protection. Use of Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise and consent management via Cookiebot demonstrate attention to bot mitigation and privacy compliance. However, explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not publicly available, which could be improved. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is strong but could benefit from enhanced transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security frameworks and practices.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact information including abuse and security emails.
  3. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  4. Regularly review and update third-party scripts to mitigate supply chain risks.
  5. Optimize website performance to improve loading speed and user experience.

Contact details published on the site

Legal name
Buckaroo B.V.
VAT number
NL808888614
Registration number
04060983
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Buckaroo B.V.
Description
Buckaroo is a payment service provider offering online payment solutions, pin payments, omnichannel payment services, and enterprise payment management.
Key services
Online payment methods integration, Pin payment terminals, Omnichannel payment solutions, Enterprise credit and subscription management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, HubSpot, Swiper.js, Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise
Frameworks
HubSpot CMS
Platforms
Umbraco Forms
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA Enterprise
  • Security headers present
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, HubSpot Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
HubSpot Marketing, Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Clear business focus on payment solutions and services.
  3. Good use of modern web technologies and analytics.
  4. Strong privacy and cookie compliance with consent management.
  5. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
  6. No direct security policy or incident response contact found.
  7. WHOIS data supports business legitimacy.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including HubSpot CMS, Umbraco Forms, Google Tag Manager, and Microsoft Clarity for analytics and user behavior tracking. The site is mobile optimized with good accessibility and SEO practices. External scripts are loaded asynchronously to improve performance. Hosting details are not explicitly disclosed but likely involve cloud infrastructure with CDN support. The site shows moderate performance with room for optimization. Technical debt appears low with current technologies and frameworks in use.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sisow.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sisow.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.