Skip to main content

Security report for sisevetefestival.ee

Hospitality · Estonia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Sisevete festival website represents a regional cultural event focused on Estonia's largest inland water bodies, offering a 12-day program of activities, workshops, and concerts. The site targets watercraft enthusiasts and cultural visitors, providing detailed event information and a newsletter subscription. Technically, the website is built on the Voog CMS platform, utilizing modern web technologies such as jQuery and Facebook Pixel for marketing and tracking. The site is mobile-optimized with good navigation and content relevance. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data, though it lacks security headers and a cookie consent mechanism, which are recommended for enhanced protection and GDPR compliance. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional, with room for improvement in privacy and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sisevetefestival.ee

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
55
Email security
55
DNS health
65
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
10
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention sisevetefestival.ee, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for sisevetefestival.ee right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The festival operates as a niche event organizer within the hospitality and cultural sectors in Estonia, leveraging local natural resources and cultural heritage. Its business model centers on event-driven revenue streams, including participant registrations and local vendor engagement. The website supports this with clear program segmentation for different water bodies and active social media channels. The partnership with Manimal for design indicates professional branding efforts. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers suggests a preference for controlled communication channels, possibly to manage inquiries efficiently. The use of external newsletter services and Facebook Pixel reflects a moderate digital marketing strategy aimed at audience engagement and growth.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a baseline security maturity with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed credentials. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. The absence of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency and preparedness communication. GDPR compliance is partially addressed via a privacy policy, but the missing cookie consent mechanism is a compliance gap. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found, indicating limited formal security communication. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small event website but could benefit from enhancements to meet higher compliance and security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and inform users about tracking.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to improve security posture.
  3. Publish a security policy and provide incident response contact information to enhance transparency and readiness.
  4. Consider adding a terms of service page to clarify user and participant obligations.
  5. Improve accessibility features to broaden audience inclusivity and meet best practices.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Sisevete festival is a 12-day event held on Estonia's largest inland water bodies - Võrtsjärv, Emajõgi, and Peipsi järv. It offers participants various activities, workshops, concerts, and cultural programs in multiple harbors along these waters.
Key services
Festival event organization, Cultural programs, Workshops, Concerts, Boat participation and registration
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, jQuery LazyLoad, Facebook Pixel, Google Fonts, Picturefill
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data
  • No vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, SendSmaily (newsletter)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is focused on a cultural festival in Estonia with clear event information.
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found; contact is via a contact page.
  4. No cookie consent banner or explicit cookie policy found.
  5. Privacy policy is present and linked in footer.
  6. No terms of service or security policy pages detected.
  7. Use of Facebook Pixel indicates user tracking for marketing purposes.
  8. Website uses Voog CMS platform.
  9. No security headers detected in HTML content; recommend adding for improved security posture.
  10. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerabilities detected in scripts or forms.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern but simple technology stack centered on the Voog CMS platform, enhanced with jQuery and lazy loading for images to optimize performance. Google Fonts and Picturefill are used for typography and responsive images, respectively. Facebook Pixel integration supports marketing analytics. The site loads moderately fast with good mobile optimization and clear navigation. However, the absence of advanced frameworks or custom backend technologies suggests limited scalability. The technical implementation is solid for the website's scope but could be modernized with progressive web app features or enhanced accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sisevetefestival.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sisevetefestival.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.