Skip to main content

Security report for sinsay.com

Sinsay · Retail · N/a

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Sinsay operates as an international online fashion retailer targeting women, men, and children across 19 countries. The website serves as a country selector landing page, directing users to localized stores. The business model is e-commerce retail with a focus on affordable fashion. The site demonstrates consistent branding and a professional presentation, indicating a mature market presence. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript frameworks and third-party services such as Cookiebot for consent management, New Relic for monitoring, and Google Tag Manager for analytics. Hosting is provided via Akamai, suggesting a robust content delivery infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly, though accessibility features are basic. From a security perspective, HTTPS is enforced, and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism is in place, supporting GDPR compliance. However, no explicit security headers were detected in the HTML content, and no direct contact information for security or incident response was found. The WHOIS data for the domain is unavailable, which slightly reduces trustworthiness but does not negate the professional appearance and functionality of the site. Overall, the website presents a low-risk profile with good privacy compliance and a solid technical foundation. Strategic improvements in security headers, transparency of contact information, and WHOIS data availability would enhance trust and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sinsay.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
80
Security headers
60
Email security
80
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Sinsay is positioned as a large-scale retail fashion brand with a broad European footprint. Its competitive advantage lies in multi-country localization and a strong online presence. The business model focuses on direct-to-consumer e-commerce sales of fashion apparel. Revenue streams are primarily from online sales across various localized stores. The target customer segments include general consumers interested in affordable fashion for all ages. The partnership ecosystem includes major advertising platforms like Google and Facebook for marketing and retargeting. The company demonstrates growth through geographic expansion and digital maturity. Operationally, the company leverages third-party services for analytics, consent management, and content delivery, indicating a strategic approach to technology adoption. The absence of direct contact information on this page suggests centralized customer service handled elsewhere or on localized sites.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses a robust cookie consent mechanism, indicating awareness of privacy and security regulations such as GDPR. The use of Cookiebot and New Relic suggests monitoring and compliance efforts. However, the lack of visible security headers (e.g., Content Security Policy, HSTS) is a gap that could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of explicit incident response contacts or security policies reduces transparency and may impact incident handling efficiency. The missing WHOIS data is a concern for domain legitimacy verification but may be due to privacy protection or registry issues. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved with enhanced header configurations and clearer security communication.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), Strict-Transport-Security (HSTS), X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen web security.
  2. Publish clear security policies and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS data to enhance domain legitimacy and trustworthiness.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all users.
  5. Maintain and regularly audit cookie consent and privacy compliance mechanisms to ensure ongoing adherence to GDPR and related regulations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Sinsay
Description
Sinsay is an online fashion store offering clothing for women, men, and kids with presence in 19 countries.
Key services
Online fashion retail for women, men, and kids
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Cookiebot, New Relic, Google Tag Manager, Akamai
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google, Facebook
Tracking pixels
Cookiebot, Akamai pixel
Marketing tools
Cookiebot consent management
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented via Cookiebot.
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on this page.
  4. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which is unusual for a .com domain.
  5. Website targets multiple European countries with localized stores.
  6. No explicit security headers detected in HTML content; recommend header audit.
  7. No forms detected on this page; only country selection links.
  8. No social media links explicitly found on this page.
  9. Website uses modern JavaScript and third-party services for analytics and consent.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript-based front end with asynchronous loading of scripts for performance optimization. Cookiebot is integrated for consent management, and New Relic is used for performance monitoring. Google Tag Manager facilitates analytics and marketing tags. Hosting is via Akamai, a reputable CDN provider, which supports fast content delivery and scalability. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design elements. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and canonical links. No CMS or backend platform is explicitly detected from the HTML content. The lack of security headers is a technical gap. Overall, the infrastructure is modern and performant but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 81/100Low26 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sinsay.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sinsay.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.