Skip to main content

Security report for sinkit.org

Sinkit · Energy · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Sinkit is a specialized organization focused on restoring the carbon cycle and stabilizing the climate by removing CO2 from the atmosphere. They operate a carbon offsetting platform and develop natural and technological carbon removal projects, targeting companies and individuals committed to achieving net zero emissions. The website demonstrates a professional and consistent brand presence with a clear mission and a strong partner network, positioning Sinkit as a credible player in the carbon removal ecosystem. Technically, the website is built on Webflow with modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Splide Slider, and integrates Google Tag Manager and Weglot for analytics and multilingual support. The site is mobile-optimized and performs moderately well, though there is room for improvement in accessibility and security headers. The use of HTTPS is confirmed, ensuring secure communications. From a security perspective, the site lacks some best practices such as security headers and cookie consent mechanisms, which could be enhanced to improve privacy compliance and user trust. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. WHOIS data is unavailable due to privacy protection, which is reasonable for this business type but limits full domain trust analysis. Overall, Sinkit presents a trustworthy and professional online presence with a clear environmental mission. Strategic improvements in security policies, privacy compliance, and transparency would further strengthen their digital maturity and stakeholder confidence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sinkit.org

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
65
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention sinkit.org, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for sinkit.org right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Sinkit operates in the energy sector with a focus on carbon removal and climate stabilization. Their business model centers on providing a platform for carbon offsetting and developing carbon removal projects, serving environmentally conscious companies and individuals. The presence of a global partner network enhances their market position and credibility. The company appears to be small-sized with no public parent or subsidiary companies. Their growth potential is supported by increasing global demand for carbon offset solutions. The website content and partner affiliations indicate a well-established ecosystem, though direct contact information is limited to forms, which may impact customer engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and secure form handling. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. There is no visible cookie consent mechanism or detailed privacy policy compliance, which may pose GDPR compliance risks. Incident response and security policy information are not published, limiting transparency. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found, indicating a low immediate risk. Enhancing security headers, privacy compliance, and publishing incident response contacts would improve the security posture significantly.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish a detailed privacy policy and terms of service pages with clear compliance statements.
  4. Provide incident response and security contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to ensure no vulnerable libraries are used.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Sinkit
Description
Sinkit is on a mission to restore the carbon cycle and stabilize the climate by removing CO2 from the atmosphere. They develop and accelerate natural and technological carbon removal solutions and provide transparent and traceable carbon offsets to companies and individuals.
Key services
Carbon removal projects, Carbon offsetting platform, Awareness raising on carbon removal
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow, jQuery, Splide Slider, Google Tag Manager, Weglot
Platforms
Webflow CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Secure forms with validation

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Weglot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Content is focused on carbon removal and climate stabilization.
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found; contact via forms only.
  4. No cookie consent banner or detailed privacy compliance mechanisms detected.
  5. WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy protection.
  6. Multiple reputable partner organizations linked.
  7. Uses modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  8. No security headers detected; could improve security posture.
  9. No terms of service page found.
  10. No incident response or security policy information available.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Splide Slider for UI components. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics, and Weglot provides multilingual support. Hosting is via Webflow's CDN, ensuring good availability and performance. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and basic accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. However, the site lacks advanced security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in load speed and accessibility compliance. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and suitable for the business needs but could benefit from enhanced security and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sinkit.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sinkit.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.