Skip to main content

Security report for singlefinance.io

Registrant of singlefinance.io · Finance · New Zealand

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Single Finance operates as a specialized DeFi yield earning platform focusing on marked-to-USD strategies that aim to protect investor capital by minimizing correlation to the general market. Positioned as a pioneering platform in this niche, it targets cryptocurrency investors seeking stable and innovative yield opportunities. The website is built on a WordPress CMS with Elementor, leveraging Cloudflare DNS services and modern web fonts, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity and performance optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and domain status clear, but lacks advanced DNS security features like DNSSEC and security headers. Privacy and compliance documentation such as privacy and cookie policies are absent in the analyzed content, which represents a compliance gap. Overall, the platform presents a professional and trustworthy front but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy disclosures to improve user trust and regulatory compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching singlefinance.io

This scan found 31 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
45
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
53
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company is a relatively new entrant in the DeFi finance sector, founded in 2021, with a small organizational size. Its business model revolves around providing DeFi yield strategies that are uniquely marked to USD, differentiating it from competitors. The target market includes crypto investors looking for capital protection and yield generation. The website content and metadata suggest a clear market positioning as a first mover in this niche. No explicit partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the content. The lack of visible contact information and compliance policies may impact customer confidence and regulatory adherence. The platform's use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices supports its growth potential and market reach.

Security posture

The website benefits from HTTPS encryption and uses Cloudflare DNS services, which provide baseline security and performance benefits. However, the absence of DNSSEC reduces DNS security robustness. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. There is no evidence of a published security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure program, which are important for transparency and trust in the security posture. No contact channels for security incidents (e.g., security@ or abuse@ emails) were found. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended security headers, DNSSEC, and formal security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance statements.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy and security contact information.
  5. Provide clear and accessible contact information including support emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Registrant of singlefinance.io
Description
Single Finance is the first marked-to-USD DeFi yield earning platform, offering strategies that protect your capital by minimizing correlations to the general market.
Key services
DeFi yield earning, Capital protection strategies, Minimizing market correlation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Cloudflare DNS, Google Fonts, Font Awesome
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status OK
  • Use of Cloudflare DNS

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses WordPress with Elementor builder
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in provided content
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in HTML content
  4. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page detected
  5. Website uses HTTPS and Cloudflare DNS but lacks DNSSEC
  6. SEO metadata and Open Graph tags are well implemented
  7. No advertising or tracking scripts detected in provided content
  8. Content is finance and DeFi focused with professional presentation
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with the Elementor page builder, indicating a common and flexible CMS platform. It uses Google Fonts and Font Awesome for typography and icons, and Cloudflare for DNS services. The site appears to be mobile optimized with good SEO metadata including Open Graph and Twitter Card tags. Performance is moderate with some deferred script loading. Accessibility features are basic but present. No advanced analytics or tracking scripts were detected in the provided content, suggesting minimal user tracking. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with singlefinance.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review singlefinance.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.