Skip to main content

Security report for single-use.nu

Single-Use Event 2025 · Healthcare · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Single-Use Event 2025 website serves as a professional platform for an industry-specific networking event focused on bioprocessing, biotechnology, and (bio)pharmaceutical manufacturing. It targets professionals such as scientists, engineers, and managers in these sectors, offering event information, speaker details, and registration capabilities. The site is hosted on the Aanmelder event platform, leveraging modern web technologies like Vue.js and Socket.io to provide a responsive and interactive user experience. The technical infrastructure is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible security vulnerabilities in the content. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data for the domain www.single-use.nu raises concerns about domain legitimacy or usage of a subdomain. Privacy and cookie policies are not present, indicating gaps in compliance. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and clearer domain registration transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching single-use.nu

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
70
Email security
45
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The event targets a niche market within the healthcare and biotechnology sectors, focusing on continuous bioprocessing and cell culture technologies. Its business model revolves around event organization, networking facilitation, and knowledge sharing through speaker programs. The website demonstrates consistent branding and professional content, supported by partnerships and sponsors visible on the site. The lack of direct contact phone numbers and limited social media presence suggests a focused, possibly smaller scale operation. The platform hosting the site (Aanmelder) is a known event registration service, which adds credibility. The absence of domain registration data is a notable anomaly that should be investigated further to ensure trustworthiness.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and does not expose sensitive data in its HTML content, indicating a baseline secure posture. However, it lacks implementation of common security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which limits transparency and preparedness for security incidents. Privacy and cookie policies are missing, which may lead to non-compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by adopting best practices and compliance measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance web security.
  3. Clarify domain registration status and ensure domain WHOIS data is accurate and publicly available to improve trust.
  4. Provide incident response and vulnerability disclosure information to increase transparency and readiness.
  5. Enhance contact information availability, including phone numbers and social media links, to improve business credibility.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Single-Use Event 2025
Description
The Single-Use Event 2025 is a networking event focused on bioprocessing, biotechnology, and (bio)pharmaceutical manufacturing, highlighting technological and product developments in Continuous Bioprocessing, Cell Culture Systems, and Microbial Systems. It targets professionals such as (bio)process technologists, (bio)pharmaceutical scientists, (bio)chemists, life scientists, biotechnologists, process engineers, and process managers.
Key services
Event hosting, Networking opportunities, Speaker programs, Exhibitor presentations
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Vue.js, jQuery, Socket.io, Google Fonts, Google Maps Embed
Frameworks
Vue 3
Platforms
Aanmelder event registration platform
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional event registration and information portal for a bioprocessing industry event.
  2. No WHOIS registration data found for the domain, indicating potential domain registration issues or use of subdomain.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies explicitly found on the site.
  4. No contact phone numbers or social media links detected; only email contact found in structured data.
  5. Site uses modern web technologies including Vue.js and Socket.io.
  6. HTTPS is enforced with no visible security issues in the HTML content.
  7. No advertising or tracking scripts detected beyond platform essentials.
  8. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
  9. No security policies, incident response, or vulnerability disclosure information is provided.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern front-end technologies including Vue.js (version 3), jQuery, and Socket.io for real-time communication. It uses Google Fonts extensively for typography and integrates Google Maps for location display. The site is hosted on the Aanmelder event platform, which provides CSS and JavaScript assets via CDN. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. There is no detected CMS, suggesting a custom or platform-specific solution. The site does not include advertising or tracking scripts beyond platform essentials, indicating a privacy-conscious approach. Technical debt appears low, but improvements in accessibility and security headers would be beneficial.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with single-use.nu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review single-use.nu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.