Skip to main content

Security report for simplyred.com

simplyred.com ltd · Media · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Simply Red's official website serves as a comprehensive digital platform for the band, offering fans access to album pre-orders, tour dates, streaming events, and merchandise. The site is professionally designed with consistent branding and clear navigation, targeting music enthusiasts and fans of Simply Red. The business model revolves around media promotion, merchandise sales, and event ticketing, positioning Simply Red as an established entity in the entertainment industry. Technically, the site is built on WordPress, leveraging common web technologies such as jQuery and Google Tag Manager, with a moderate performance profile and good mobile optimization. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and implements cookie consent mechanisms compliant with GDPR, though lacks explicit security policies or incident response contacts. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises questions about domain registration status, possibly indicating a staging environment or privacy protection. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional but would benefit from enhanced transparency regarding domain registration and security policies.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching simplyred.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
80
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Simply Red operates in the media sector with a focus on music and entertainment. The website supports multiple revenue streams including album sales, merchandise, and live event ticketing through partner platforms. The strong social media integration and official branding reinforce market positioning. The use of partner domains for merchandise and streaming ticket sales indicates a collaborative ecosystem. The business targets a global fan base with a UK-centric company registration. Growth indicators include new album releases and live streaming events. Strategic observations suggest maintaining domain registration transparency and expanding direct contact channels could enhance credibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a baseline security posture with HTTPS enforcement and cookie consent compliance. However, it lacks visible security headers and published security or incident response policies, which are important for mature security practices. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of third-party scripts like Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel introduces moderate tracking but is managed with user consent. The absence of security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policies limits transparency. Overall, the security maturity is moderate with room for improvement in policy publication and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response plan accessible on the website.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Verify and clarify domain registration details to improve trust and legitimacy perception.
  4. Introduce a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and plugins.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
simplyred.com ltd
Registration number
4260793
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
simplyred.com ltd
Description
Official website for Simply Red, a music band, providing information on albums, tours, streaming, archive, and merchandise.
Key services
Album promotion and sales, Tour dates and ticket sales, Merchandise sales, Streaming event promotion, Mailing list subscription
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Cookie Law Info plugin
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager), Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Cookie Law Info plugin
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is focused on music band Simply Red with multiple sections promoting albums, tours, and merchandise.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented and GDPR compliant.
  4. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found on the site.
  5. WHOIS data is unavailable or domain not registered under the queried name, possibly indicating staging environment or privacy protection.
  6. Use of multiple external domains for merchandise and ticket sales.
  7. Social media presence is strong with verified official accounts linked.
  8. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts published.
  9. Website uses WordPress CMS with common plugins and tracking scripts.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with jQuery and uses Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing. The presence of a cookie consent plugin indicates attention to privacy compliance. Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness. The site uses a staging subdirectory which may indicate ongoing development or testing. No advanced frameworks or hosting provider details were identified. Technical debt appears low but could be improved by optimizing scripts and enhancing accessibility. The site lacks advanced security headers and explicit technical security controls visible in the HTML.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with simplyred.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review simplyred.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.