Skip to main content

Security report for simpleapoistovna.sk

Simplea pojišťovna, a.s. · Finance · Slovakia

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

79/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Simplea pojišťovna, a.s. is a Slovak life insurance company focused on providing straightforward risk life insurance products covering life, disability, and income loss. The company emphasizes simplicity, fast claims processing, and higher coverage compared to competitors. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and provides clear contact information and social proof, positioning the company as a trustworthy niche player in the Slovak insurance market. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript frameworks and lazy loading for performance, with Google Tag Manager for analytics. Security posture is good with HTTPS and no visible vulnerabilities, though security policies and incident response information are lacking. Overall, the site is compliant with GDPR and provides cookie consent mechanisms, supporting privacy compliance. The domain registration aligns well with the business claims, enhancing legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include publishing security and incident response policies and adding vulnerability disclosure information to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching simpleapoistovna.sk

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
90
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
79

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Simplea operates in the finance sector, specifically life insurance, targeting Slovak individuals seeking risk coverage without investment components. The business model focuses on risk insurance with transparent, fast payouts and no investment element, differentiating it from traditional insurers. The company leverages modern technology for customer experience and operational efficiency. Partnerships with related Simplea sites in Czech Republic and Poland, as well as affiliated financial service sites, indicate a regional group presence. The company maintains a small size with a focused market niche. Customer ratings and founder statements enhance credibility. The website content and structure support clear communication of product benefits and pricing, aiding customer decision-making.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security posture with enforced HTTPS, no exposed sensitive data, and use of reputable analytics tools. However, it lacks explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, which are important for comprehensive security governance and customer trust. No security headers were detected in the HTML content, suggesting room for improvement in HTTP header security controls. The absence of visible vulnerabilities and the use of modern frameworks reduce risk exposure. GDPR compliance is supported by privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms. Overall, the security maturity is moderate to good but can be enhanced by formalizing security governance documentation and incident handling procedures.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact information for reporting security issues.
  3. Implement and configure security HTTP headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options.
  4. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct regular security audits to maintain compliance and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Simplea pojišťovna, a.s.
Description
Životné poistenie, ktoré Vás nenechá v štichu. Poisťovňa, ktorá sa vráti k základom a naozaj pomôže ľuďom prekonať ťažké chvíle.
Key services
Life insurance, Disability insurance, Income loss insurance
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript ES modules, Google Tag Manager, LazySizes (lazy loading images), Typekit fonts
Frameworks
swup (page transitions), StimulusJS (data-controller attributes)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented in Slovak language targeting local customers.
  3. Strong focus on transparency and customer trust with clear contact info and social proof.
  4. No explicit privacy or security policy pages beyond GDPR and cookie policy references.
  5. Modern frontend technologies used with good mobile optimization.
  6. No visible security vulnerabilities or suspicious external links.
  7. No explicit terms of service page found.
  8. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information provided.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern frontend stack including ES modules, StimulusJS for controllers, swup for page transitions, and lazy loading of images via LazySizes. Google Tag Manager is integrated for analytics and marketing. Fonts are served via Adobe Typekit. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility considerations, though accessibility is basic. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and optimized images. No CMS or hosting provider is explicitly detected. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. The technical implementation is solid with opportunities to improve security headers and accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with simpleapoistovna.sk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review simpleapoistovna.sk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.