SilverDome Investment Partners is a Swedish-based investment fund company specializing in alternative absolute return strategies, offering a daily traded UCITS fund named SilverDome One. The company targets investors seeking stable, diversified, and capital-preserving investment options. The website is built on WordPress with Elementor, featuring professional design and clear navigation. It uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and implements a GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanism. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks published security policies and security headers. The domain registration is consistent with the business founding date and shows no suspicious patterns. Overall, the website presents a credible and professional investment service with room for improvement in privacy and security transparency.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Security headers
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
Controls resources the browser is allowed to load
What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application
This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
70
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
50
Average
63
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention silverdomeip.com, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for silverdomeip.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
SilverDome positions itself as a niche player in the finance sector, focusing on resilient value creation through innovative investment strategies. The business model includes direct investment and partnerships with distributors. The company emphasizes trust, transparency, and capital preservation, supported by testimonials from partners and seed investors. The website content and branding are consistent and targeted towards sophisticated investors. The company was founded in 2021 and operates primarily in Sweden. The use of modern web technologies and marketing tools indicates a digitally mature approach, though privacy policy and terms of service are missing, which could impact regulatory compliance and user trust.
Security posture
The website benefits from HTTPS encryption and a cookie consent banner, indicating basic compliance with privacy regulations. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of published security or incident response policies reduce the overall security maturity. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The domain lacks DNSSEC, which is a recommended security enhancement. Incident response readiness and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not publicly available, which could be a concern for security-conscious users. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved with better transparency and technical controls.
Recommendations
Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
Implement and display a security policy and incident response plan on the website.
Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection.
Enable DNSSEC for the domain to improve DNS security.
Regularly audit and update third-party plugins and scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Company
SilverDome Investment Partners
Description
An expertly crafted fund built to achieve stable returns through innovative strategies, regardless of market conditions. SilverDome offers an Alternative Absolute Return strategy available as a daily traded UCITS fund. The company emphasizes stable, sophisticated investment solutions designed to deliver meaningful results in any economic condition.
Key services
Alternative Absolute Return Fund, Daily traded UCITS fund, Investment strategy evaluation, Capital preservation, Stable dividends
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent
Technology
Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Elementor Pro, Google Tag Manager, jQuery, Swiper.js, Popper.js, Tippy.js, Complianz GDPR plugin
Frameworks
Elementor, UiCore Framework
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good
Security
Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
HTTPS enabled
Cookie consent mechanism implemented
No exposed sensitive data found in HTML
Analytics and tracking
Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic
Advertising
Transparency
basic
Site quality
Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high
Key observations
Website uses WordPress with Elementor and related plugins.
Cookie consent banner is implemented with Complianz GDPR plugin.
No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
Contact information is clearly provided including email, phone, and physical address.
No security or incident response policies published.
Website content is professionally presented with investment fund focus.
No suspicious or malicious content detected.
No social media links explicitly found in the HTML content.
Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking.
Technical notes
Notes
The website is built on WordPress CMS using Elementor and Elementor Pro for design and layout. It employs modern JavaScript libraries such as Swiper.js for carousels and Tippy.js for tooltips. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking, integrated asynchronously for performance. The site loads multiple CSS and JS assets from its own domain and trusted CDNs. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is supported by Yoast SEO plugin with proper meta tags and structured data in JSON-LD format. Hosting provider is not explicitly identified but domain registrar is GoDaddy. The site uses a cookie consent plugin (Complianz) for GDPR compliance. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and well-implemented with opportunities for security hardening and privacy enhancements.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with silverdomeip.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review silverdomeip.com.