Skip to main content

Security report for silverdomeip.com

SilverDome Investment Partners · Finance · Sweden

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SilverDome Investment Partners is a Swedish-based investment fund company specializing in alternative absolute return strategies, offering a daily traded UCITS fund named SilverDome One. The company targets investors seeking stable, diversified, and capital-preserving investment options. The website is built on WordPress with Elementor, featuring professional design and clear navigation. It uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and implements a GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanism. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks published security policies and security headers. The domain registration is consistent with the business founding date and shows no suspicious patterns. Overall, the website presents a credible and professional investment service with room for improvement in privacy and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching silverdomeip.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
70
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
50
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention silverdomeip.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for silverdomeip.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

SilverDome positions itself as a niche player in the finance sector, focusing on resilient value creation through innovative investment strategies. The business model includes direct investment and partnerships with distributors. The company emphasizes trust, transparency, and capital preservation, supported by testimonials from partners and seed investors. The website content and branding are consistent and targeted towards sophisticated investors. The company was founded in 2021 and operates primarily in Sweden. The use of modern web technologies and marketing tools indicates a digitally mature approach, though privacy policy and terms of service are missing, which could impact regulatory compliance and user trust.

Security posture

The website benefits from HTTPS encryption and a cookie consent banner, indicating basic compliance with privacy regulations. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of published security or incident response policies reduce the overall security maturity. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The domain lacks DNSSEC, which is a recommended security enhancement. Incident response readiness and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not publicly available, which could be a concern for security-conscious users. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved with better transparency and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement and display a security policy and incident response plan on the website.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection.
  4. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to improve DNS security.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party plugins and scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SilverDome Investment Partners
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SilverDome Investment Partners
Description
An expertly crafted fund built to achieve stable returns through innovative strategies, regardless of market conditions. SilverDome offers an Alternative Absolute Return strategy available as a daily traded UCITS fund. The company emphasizes stable, sophisticated investment solutions designed to deliver meaningful results in any economic condition.
Key services
Alternative Absolute Return Fund, Daily traded UCITS fund, Investment strategy evaluation, Capital preservation, Stable dividends
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Elementor Pro, Google Tag Manager, jQuery, Swiper.js, Popper.js, Tippy.js, Complianz GDPR plugin
Frameworks
Elementor, UiCore Framework
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data found in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses WordPress with Elementor and related plugins.
  2. Cookie consent banner is implemented with Complianz GDPR plugin.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided including email, phone, and physical address.
  5. No security or incident response policies published.
  6. Website content is professionally presented with investment fund focus.
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  8. No social media links explicitly found in the HTML content.
  9. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using Elementor and Elementor Pro for design and layout. It employs modern JavaScript libraries such as Swiper.js for carousels and Tippy.js for tooltips. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking, integrated asynchronously for performance. The site loads multiple CSS and JS assets from its own domain and trusted CDNs. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is supported by Yoast SEO plugin with proper meta tags and structured data in JSON-LD format. Hosting provider is not explicitly identified but domain registrar is GoDaddy. The site uses a cookie consent plugin (Complianz) for GDPR compliance. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and well-implemented with opportunities for security hardening and privacy enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with silverdomeip.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review silverdomeip.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.