Skip to main content

Security report for sieviesuklubs.lv

Media · Latvia

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Maminuklubs.lv is a Latvian media website focused on providing content and educational resources for women and families, including parenting courses and information related to pregnancy and childbirth. The site integrates multiple third-party services such as Cookiebot for cookie consent management, Google Tag Manager for analytics, and video embedding platforms like Vimeo and YouTube. The website is well-structured with good SEO practices and mobile optimization, targeting a Latvian-speaking audience interested in family and parenting topics. However, the absence of explicit privacy policy and terms of service pages, as well as missing contact information, limits its transparency and user trust. The WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, restricting domain legitimacy verification.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sieviesuklubs.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
50
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates in the media sector, providing family and parenting-related content primarily for women and parents in Latvia. Its business model appears to be content-driven, possibly monetized through advertising and partnerships with third-party service providers. The use of multiple analytics and marketing tools indicates a focus on audience engagement and targeted advertising. The lack of visible company registration or contact details suggests a small or medium-sized operation with limited public business disclosures. The site leverages partnerships with payment processors and chat services, indicating some level of user interaction and possibly e-commerce or subscription services.

Security posture

The website demonstrates basic security awareness by implementing a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR principles. However, no security headers were detected in the provided data, and SSL configuration details are unknown, which may expose the site to certain web-based attacks. The absence of visible privacy and security policies, as well as incident response contacts, indicates gaps in compliance and readiness. The use of reputable third-party services like Cookiebot and Google Analytics adds some trust, but the site would benefit from enhanced security practices such as enforcing HTTPS, adding security headers, and publishing clear security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve transparency and compliance.
  2. Add visible and verified contact information including emails and phone numbers for user support and incident reporting.
  3. Configure and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Ensure HTTPS is properly configured and enforced site-wide with strong SSL/TLS settings.
  5. Establish an incident response process and publish relevant contact channels to enhance security posture and user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Raidījums ģimenes sievietei STV Pirmā. Vecāku skola - kursi topošajiem un esošajiem vecākiem
Key services
TV show content, parenting school courses, pregnancy and childbirth information
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Cookiebot, Google Tag Manager
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Gemius, Cxense
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Cxense, Gemius
Tracking pixels
Cookiebot
Marketing tools
Tawk.to chat
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with full content and no blocking detected.
  2. Cookie consent is implemented with detailed cookie categories and providers.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the provided content.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content.
  5. Multiple third-party services used for analytics, marketing, and video embedding.
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain trust verification.
  7. Website targets Latvian-speaking women and parents with family and parenting content.
  8. No security headers detected in the provided data; SSL status unknown.
  9. Good SEO and meta tags present including Open Graph and Google site verification.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack including jQuery, Cookiebot for consent management, and Google Tag Manager for analytics. It loads external scripts asynchronously to improve performance. The site includes meta tags for SEO and social media integration but lacks visible structured data like JSON-LD. Mobile optimization is good, and the design is consistent and professional. However, the hosting provider and CMS are not identifiable from the provided data. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in accessibility and security configurations. The site uses multiple third-party domains for video content, analytics, and marketing, which increases complexity and tracking footprint.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sieviesuklubs.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sieviesuklubs.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.