Skip to main content

Security report for sibulatee.ee

MTÜ Sibulatee · Hospitality · Estonia

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Sibulatee is a non-profit organization dedicated to promoting the cultural and tourism assets of the Peipsimaa region in Estonia. The website serves as a comprehensive portal for events, local businesses, cultural heritage, and educational opportunities, targeting tourists and local communities interested in authentic regional experiences. The platform leverages WordPress and WooCommerce to provide event listings, e-commerce for local products, and seminar information, supported by active social media engagement and newsletter subscriptions. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript libraries and tracking tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Hotjar, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, though improvements in security headers and policies are recommended. Privacy compliance is addressed with a clear privacy policy and cookie banner, aligning with GDPR requirements. Overall, the site is professionally designed, user-friendly, and trustworthy, with clear contact information and consistent branding. No critical vulnerabilities or blocking mechanisms were detected, supporting a positive risk profile.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sibulatee.ee

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates in the hospitality and non-profit sectors, focusing on regional cultural tourism. Its business model revolves around community engagement, event promotion, and supporting local enterprises through digital presence and e-commerce. The website's market position is that of a regional leader in cultural tourism promotion, leveraging partnerships and local networks. Revenue streams likely include event fees, local product sales, and possibly grants or sponsorships. The target audience includes tourists, educators, and cultural enthusiasts. The presence of testimonials and partner logos enhances credibility. The technical infrastructure supports scalability and user engagement, though hosting details are not explicit. The organization maintains a moderate digital marketing footprint with tracking and retargeting tools.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a baseline security maturity with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent mechanisms in place. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options suggests room for enhancement to mitigate common web threats. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified in the HTML content. The use of popular plugins and frameworks necessitates regular updates to prevent exploitation. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies are not publicly available, which could be a gap in security governance. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a non-profit cultural site but would benefit from formalized policies and technical hardening.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Establish and publish an incident response and vulnerability disclosure policy to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Regularly audit and update all WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate risks from known vulnerabilities.
  4. Explicitly enable and configure HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) to enforce HTTPS usage.
  5. Review third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy risks and improve site performance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
MTÜ Sibulatee
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
MTÜ Sibulatee
Description
Sibulatee is a regional cultural and tourism initiative promoting the Peipsimaa area, highlighting its multicultural heritage, events, local businesses, and cultural experiences.
Key services
Event listings and organization, Local business directory, E-commerce (local products), Seminars and educational excursions, Tourism information and cultural promotion
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, jQuery, Swiper.js, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, Mailchimp, Instagram Feed plugin
Frameworks
WordPress, WooCommerce
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (implied by WordPress ecosystem)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar
Marketing tools
Mailchimp
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a well-maintained WordPress site focused on regional cultural tourism.
  2. Content is rich with events, offers, and local business information.
  3. Good use of social media and newsletter for community engagement.
  4. No critical security issues detected but security headers could be improved.
  5. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  6. No terms of service or explicit security policy pages found.
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information available.
  8. Contact information is clearly provided with email, phone, address, and contact form.
  9. No suspicious or malicious external links detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with WooCommerce for e-commerce functionality, supported by jQuery and modern JavaScript libraries such as Swiper.js for UI components. It integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, and Mailchimp, indicating a mature digital marketing strategy. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and uses lazy loading for images to improve performance. SEO practices are evident with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. However, some accessibility features are basic and could be improved. Hosting details are not explicit, but performance is moderate, suggesting potential for optimization. The technical stack is standard for cultural tourism sites, balancing functionality and user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sibulatee.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sibulatee.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.