Skip to main content

Security report for shureluck.nl

Shureluck B.V. · Finance · Netherlands

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Shureluck B.V. is a Dutch legal consultancy specializing in fiscal and financial law, providing tailored legal advice and assistance primarily to entrepreneurs and consumers dealing with financial products and services. The company operates on a no-cure/no-pay basis, focusing on claims against banks, insurers, and asset managers. Their market position is that of a specialized boutique firm with a professional and trustworthy image, supported by client testimonials and a clear service offering. Technically, the website is built using the One.com Web Editor platform, hosted by Hostnet B.V., and employs standard web technologies such as HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile devices, with good SEO practices but lacks advanced accessibility features. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating a privacy-conscious approach. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with DNSSEC enabled, which is positive. However, it lacks visible security headers and published security policies, which are areas for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. The absence of privacy and cookie policies is a compliance gap, especially under GDPR. Overall, the website presents a low-risk profile with a solid business credibility but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security best practices to improve trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching shureluck.nl

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Shureluck B.V. targets a niche market within the financial legal advisory sector in the Netherlands, focusing on fiscal disputes and claims related to financial products. Their no-cure/no-pay business model reduces client risk and likely attracts SMEs and individual consumers. The company leverages a professional team with expertise in financial law, supported by client testimonials that enhance credibility. The firm’s digital presence is straightforward, emphasizing direct contact and personalized service. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries, indicating a focused and independent operation. Growth potential lies in expanding collective procedures and increasing digital engagement through enhanced content and compliance transparency.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture. HTTPS and DNSSEC are implemented, ensuring encrypted communication and DNS integrity. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is published, which limits transparency and preparedness. The contact form collects personal data but lacks visible security assurances or privacy notices. No tracking or analytics scripts reduce privacy risks but also limit monitoring capabilities. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for a small legal consultancy but requires enhancements to meet higher compliance and security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Implement and configure security headers to protect against common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Add a visible vulnerability disclosure or security contact channel to improve incident response readiness.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users.
  5. Consider integrating privacy-friendly analytics to monitor site usage while respecting user privacy.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Shureluck B.V.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Shureluck B.V.
Description
Shureluck B.V. is a legal expert firm specializing in fiscal and financial law. They provide personalized legal advice and assistance focused on financial products and services from banks, insurers, and asset managers. Their services include tailored advice, legal assistance, and collective procedures based on Dutch law. They operate on a no-cure/no-pay basis, targeting entrepreneurs and consumers seeking compensation claims.
Key services
Advies op Maat, Juridische Bijstand, Collectieve procedures
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript
Frameworks
One.com Web Editor
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • DNSSEC enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with multiple channels.
  4. Professional presentation with consistent branding and good content quality.
  5. No visible security headers detected; opportunity for security improvements.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected, indicating minimal user tracking.
  7. Social media presence on Facebook and LinkedIn is linked.
  8. No advertising or marketing tools detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the One.com Web Editor CMS platform, using standard web technologies (HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript). Hosting is provided by Hostnet B.V., a reputable Dutch hosting provider. The site loads with moderate performance and is optimized for mobile devices with responsive design elements. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. However, the site lacks advanced technical security measures such as security headers and does not use common analytics or marketing tools. The contact form is functional and collects user data but does not display explicit security or privacy assurances. Overall, the technical infrastructure is stable but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with shureluck.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review shureluck.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.