Skip to main content

Security report for shs-viveon.com

SHS Viveon AG · Finance · Germany

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SHS Viveon AG operates a modular software platform focused on risk, credit, and compliance management for businesses, primarily in the finance and technology sectors. The company targets organizations seeking to automate and streamline their financial and regulatory risk processes. The website demonstrates a professional market presence with notable clients and a comprehensive suite of services. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern SEO and performance optimizations, including cookie consent and analytics integrations. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and cookie consent but lacks explicit security headers and incident response disclosures. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises some concerns about domain registration transparency, though the website content and business information appear legitimate. Overall, the site is well-designed, user-friendly, and compliant with privacy regulations, making it a credible business platform.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching shs-viveon.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
70
Email security
55
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
83
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention shs-viveon.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
8
Employees
0
Customers
7
Third parties
1
Weak passwords
0%

4 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for shs-viveon.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a specialized provider of risk and compliance management software, serving medium-sized to large enterprises. Its business model is B2B SaaS with modular offerings tailored to various risk management needs. The presence of major clients and case studies indicates a strong market position and trust. The company leverages partnerships for recruitment and marketing. Revenue streams likely include software licensing, cloud services, and consulting. The website content and social media presence support a professional and growth-oriented business strategy.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and implements cookie consent mechanisms, indicating attention to user privacy and security. However, the lack of visible HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are provided, which could be enhanced to improve transparency and readiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of reputable plugins and analytics tools is noted, but continuous monitoring of third-party scripts is recommended.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to comply with standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure transparency and trustworthiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SHS Viveon AG
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SHS Viveon AG
Description
SHS Viveon provides a modular platform for automated risk, credit, and compliance management, simplifying financial and regulatory risk management for companies.
Key services
RiskSuite Business Process Automation, DebiTEX Credit Management, Compliance KYC & Compliance Management, Connect Data Integration, Insights Risk Analyses and Insights, Cloud Service for data security
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, WP Rocket, Borlabs Cookie, HubSpot Forms, Google Tag Manager, jQuery, Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (Borlabs Cookie)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
HubSpot
Marketing tools
HubSpot Forms
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation
  2. Uses modern WordPress CMS with SEO and performance plugins
  3. Has clear privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms
  4. Includes multiple contact methods including phone and forms
  5. No visible security policy or incident response information
  6. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which is a concern
  7. No adult or questionable content detected
  8. Social media presence on LinkedIn, Twitter, Facebook, YouTube
  9. Good branding consistency and professional design
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform, utilizing popular plugins such as Yoast SEO for search engine optimization, WP Rocket for performance optimization, and Borlabs Cookie for GDPR-compliant cookie management. It integrates HubSpot forms for lead capture and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing tracking. The site uses jQuery and Bootstrap frameworks for UI and responsiveness. Performance optimizations include lazy loading of images and scripts, preloading fonts, and DNS prefetching. The site is mobile-optimized with a responsive design and good navigation clarity. Technical debt appears low, but security header implementation and domain registration transparency could be improved to reduce risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with shs-viveon.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review shs-viveon.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.