Skip to main content

Security report for shockescaperoom.com

Shock Creations · Hospitality · Spain

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Shock Creations operates as an entertainment service provider specializing in Escape Rooms and Hall Escapes located in Madrid, Spain. The website presents a professional and engaging front with clear branding and SEO metadata, targeting a general audience interested in immersive entertainment experiences. The business appears to be a small local operator with a focus on fun and interactive activities. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using Elementor, leveraging common web technologies such as jQuery and Google Fonts. The site shows moderate performance and good mobile optimization, though accessibility features are basic. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied but lacking explicit security headers and visible security policies. Privacy compliance is limited, with a cookie consent mechanism present but no clear privacy or terms of service pages. The absence of WHOIS data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and trustworthiness, impacting the overall risk profile. Strategic improvements in security, privacy transparency, and domain registration verification are recommended to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Facebook, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No DMARC record found

      DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

      What to do: Add DMARC record: "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@yourdomain.com"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching shockescaperoom.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
30
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Shock Creations positions itself as a niche entertainment provider in the hospitality sector, focusing on escape room experiences in Madrid. Its business model revolves around direct consumer engagement through physical entertainment services. The website content and metadata suggest a well-defined target market of local customers seeking recreational activities. The company leverages digital presence primarily for marketing and booking facilitation. There is no evidence of extensive partnerships or subsidiaries. The lack of detailed business registration or contact information limits deeper business intelligence insights. Growth potential may be tied to expanding digital engagement and improving trust signals online.

Security posture

The current security posture of the website is moderate but has notable gaps. HTTPS is used, ensuring encrypted communication, but no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are important for mitigating common web attacks. No security or incident response policies are publicly available, and no dedicated security contact channels exist. The cookie consent mechanism indicates some awareness of privacy requirements, but the absence of a privacy policy and terms of service pages is a compliance gap. The missing WHOIS data is a critical concern, as it hinders verification of domain ownership and legitimacy. Overall, the site would benefit from enhanced security controls, transparency, and compliance documentation to reduce risk and improve user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add and configure essential security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to strengthen web security.
  3. Verify domain registration details and ensure WHOIS information is publicly available or properly protected with justification.
  4. Establish clear contact channels for security incidents, including a security@ or abuse@ email address.
  5. Conduct regular security audits of plugins and scripts to identify and remediate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Shock Creations
Description
Ven a disfrutar a Shock de nuestros Escape Rooms y Hall Escapes en Madrid. Tenemos los Escape Rooms y Hall Escapes más divertidos. ¡Elige tu experiencia!
Key services
Escape Rooms, Hall Escapes
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Elementor, Google Fonts, Flatpickr
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage implied by canonical URL
  • Cookie consent implemented

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  2. WHOIS data is missing, which is a critical gap in domain legitimacy verification.
  3. Website uses WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented, but no explicit privacy or terms of service pages found.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided HTML content.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  7. No visible security headers detected in the provided data.
  8. Website content is focused on entertainment services in Madrid, Spain.
  9. No adult or NSFW content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
  10. SEO metadata and Open Graph tags are well implemented.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using the Elementor page builder, which is a modern and widely used technology stack for content management and design flexibility. The site loads various CSS and JS assets including jQuery and Flatpickr for date picking functionality. Google Fonts are used for typography. The site shows good mobile responsiveness and SEO metadata implementation, including Open Graph and Twitter Card tags. However, no advanced analytics or tracking scripts were detected in the provided content, indicating minimal user tracking. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by the number of loaded assets. Accessibility is basic and could be improved with ARIA roles and semantic HTML enhancements. Hosting provider details are not evident from the data. Overall, the technical infrastructure is standard for small to medium WordPress sites but could benefit from optimization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with shockescaperoom.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review shockescaperoom.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.