Skip to main content

Security report for shifermaja.lv

Pāvilostas Šīfermāja, Šīfermāja SIA · Hospitality · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Pāvilostas Šīfermāja, operated by Šīfermāja SIA, is a small hospitality business based in Pāvilosta, Latvia, offering apartment and studio rentals along with shared spaces and sauna services. The website is built on WordPress using a modern tech stack including Bootstrap, jQuery, and social media integration plugins, reflecting a moderate level of digital maturity. The site is well-branded and provides clear contact information and social media presence, targeting tourists and visitors seeking accommodation in the region. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled, but lacks advanced security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies, which are important for compliance and trust. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain registration verification. Overall, the site is professional and functional but could improve in privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching shifermaja.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the hospitality sector, focusing on property rentals in a niche local market. It leverages social media channels for marketing and customer engagement. The business model is direct rental services with a focus on family and group accommodations. The company appears to be small-sized with a local market position and no visible parent or subsidiary companies. The website content and social media integration suggest active engagement with customers and community events. Revenue streams likely come from rental bookings and associated hospitality services. The lack of detailed business certifications or compliance documentation indicates room for maturity growth.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS, which is a fundamental security requirement. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces its defense against common web attacks. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The site lacks formal security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, which are important for transparency and trust. The use of third-party plugins and social media integrations introduces potential risk vectors that require regular updates and monitoring. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved with standard best practices and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to enhance GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve protection against common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and security readiness.
  4. Regularly audit and update all WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate risks from outdated components.
  5. Consider adding accessibility improvements and SEO enhancements to improve user experience and search engine visibility.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Šīfermāja SIA
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Pāvilostas Šīfermāja, Šīfermāja SIA
Description
apartment house
Key services
Apartment rentals, Studio rentals, Shared spaces (Salons), Sauna services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Bootstrap, FontAwesome, Owl Carousel, Yoast SEO, Ultimate Social Media Icons plugin, Instagram Feed plugin, Joinchat WhatsApp plugin
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No visible exposed sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook SDK
Marketing tools
Ultimate Social Media Icons, Instagram Feed, Joinchat WhatsApp
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based hospitality rental site for Pāvilosta, Latvia.
  2. Content is in English with some Latvian language elements.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided with phone numbers and email.
  4. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram is integrated.
  5. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the analyzed page.
  6. No visible security headers detected in the HTML content.
  7. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  8. No signs of adult or NSFW content.
  9. No forms collecting personal data found on this page.
  10. Site uses multiple plugins for social media and chat integration.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a Bootstrap framework for responsive design. It uses jQuery and FontAwesome for UI components and icons. Social media feeds and chat functionality are integrated via plugins, enhancing user engagement. The site loads multiple CSS and JS assets from its own domain and trusted external sources like Google Fonts and Facebook SDK. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimization indicators. Accessibility is basic with room for improvement. SEO is supported by Yoast SEO plugin with proper meta tags and structured data in JSON-LD format. The lack of security headers and privacy policies indicates technical debt in compliance and security domains. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with shifermaja.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review shifermaja.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.