Skip to main content

Security report for shell.dk

Shell · Energy · Denmark

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Email security and SSL/TLS.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Shell i Danmark operates as the Danish branch of the global energy and petrochemical conglomerate Shell plc. The website serves both private and business customers in Denmark, offering services such as fuel supply, Shell Card management, car wash, and electric vehicle charging. The site reflects a strong market position supported by Shell's international brand and local licensee DCC Energi A/S. The business model focuses on energy distribution and customer service within Denmark, leveraging Shell's global expertise and technology.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching shell.dk

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
80
Email security
40
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Shell i Danmark is positioned as a key player in the Danish energy sector, supported by its affiliation with Shell plc and local subsidiaries. The company targets both private consumers and commercial clients, providing a broad range of energy-related services. The partnership with DCC Energi A/S as licensee strengthens its local market presence. The website's content and structure indicate a mature business with a focus on customer engagement and digital service delivery. The presence of multiple social media channels and links to Shell's international site highlights a well-integrated global-local strategy.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses modern web technologies, including Adobe Experience Manager CMS and Adobe Launch for tag management. Privacy and cookie policies are present with consent mechanisms, indicating GDPR compliance. However, explicit security headers like CSP or HSTS are not detected in the HTML source, and no dedicated security or incident response pages are found. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were identified in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by publishing security policies and implementing additional HTTP security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Create and publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance contact information availability, including verified company emails and phone numbers, to improve customer trust and support.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to ensure compliance with privacy regulations and minimize security risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Shell
Description
Shell er en global koncern bestående af energi- og petrokemiske virksomheder.
Key services
Fuel supply, Shell Card services, Car wash services, Electric vehicle charging, Customer account management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript modules, SVG graphics, CSS variables, Responsive grid layout
Frameworks
Adobe Launch (tag management)
Platforms
Adobe Experience Manager CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Consent banner for cookies
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Adobe Launch
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Adobe Launch
Marketing tools
Adobe Launch
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible and not blocked by WAF or security challenges.
  2. Content is in Danish targeting Danish customers.
  3. Strong corporate branding consistent with Shell international standards.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content.
  5. Social media presence on major platforms with official Shell accounts.
  6. Privacy and cookie policies are present and include consent mechanisms.
  7. No security.txt or explicit vulnerability disclosure found.
  8. WHOIS data is unavailable or protected, common for corporate domains.
  9. Website uses Adobe Experience Manager CMS and Adobe Launch for tag management.
  10. No explicit security headers detected in HTML source but HTTPS is enforced.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Adobe Experience Manager CMS, utilizing modern JavaScript modules and CSS variables for responsive design. The use of Adobe Launch indicates a mature tag management and analytics setup. The site is mobile-optimized with good accessibility features and SEO practices. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by the CMS and rich media content. No broken elements or errors were detected in the HTML. Opportunities exist to improve hosting transparency and optimize security headers for better technical robustness.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with shell.dk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review shell.dk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.