Skip to main content

Security report for sexecherche.com

My Blog · Media · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SexeCherche.com is an adult content directory and review website that aggregates and categorizes various pornographic sites including porn tubes, premium sites, sex cams, and niche categories. The site targets adult users seeking curated adult entertainment resources and operates primarily as an affiliate/referral platform. The business model relies on linking users to external adult content providers and monetizing through affiliate partnerships. The website is built on WordPress CMS with SEO optimization and uses Matomo and Google Analytics for visitor tracking. The technical infrastructure is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices, but lacks advanced security headers and privacy compliance features. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but missing key security policies and contact information for incident response. The domain WHOIS data is unavailable, raising concerns about domain legitimacy and registration status. Overall, the site is functional and professionally designed but requires improvements in privacy compliance, security best practices, and transparency to enhance trustworthiness and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sexecherche.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website occupies a niche in the adult entertainment media sector, focusing on aggregating and reviewing adult content sites. Its competitive advantage lies in comprehensive categorization and extensive listings across multiple adult content genres. The business model is affiliate-driven, generating revenue through referrals to external adult sites. Target customers are adult internet users seeking curated pornographic content. Growth indicators include frequent content updates and broad category coverage. The partnership ecosystem includes numerous external adult sites but lacks visible direct business partnerships or certifications. Strategic observations suggest the need for enhanced compliance and trust signals to improve market position and user confidence.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is basic. HTTPS is enforced, which is a critical positive. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No explicit privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR and other privacy regulations. No incident response or security contact information is provided, limiting readiness for security events. The use of Matomo analytics suggests some privacy awareness but is insufficient without formal policies. The website does not expose sensitive data or use vulnerable libraries based on available data. Overall, the security posture requires significant improvements in policy transparency, header implementation, and incident readiness to reduce business risk.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR and enhance user trust.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve defense against web vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish clear contact information including security incident response contacts to improve incident management and transparency.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain platform security.
  5. Consider domain registration verification and WHOIS transparency to improve legitimacy and trustworthiness perception.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
My Blog
Description
The Best Porn Sites and of Free Sex are on SexeCherche. A thorough selection of Sites for Adults: Porn Tubes, Sex Cams, Adult Dating ...
Key services
Listing and reviewing adult porn tube sites, Listing and reviewing adult premium sites, Listing and reviewing sex cam sites, Categorized adult content directories
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, PHP, jQuery 3.7.1, Google Fonts, Matomo Analytics, All in One SEO Pro 4.8.3.2
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Matomo for privacy-respecting analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo, Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is an adult content directory and review aggregator
  2. No visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found
  4. Uses WordPress CMS with SEO and analytics plugins
  5. No security headers detected in provided data
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, domain registration status unknown
  7. No WAF or blocking detected, content fully accessible
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using version 6.8.1 with jQuery and Google Fonts integration. SEO is managed via All in One SEO Pro plugin, and analytics are handled by Matomo and Google Analytics. The site shows good mobile responsiveness and moderate performance. However, there is a lack of advanced security headers and no visible CDN or hosting provider information. The technical stack is standard for content-driven sites but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance optimizations. No critical technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected, but improvements in accessibility and privacy compliance are recommended to reduce operational risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sexecherche.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sexecherche.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.