Skip to main content

Security report for sexart.com

SexArt · Media · Finland

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SexArt is a premium adult entertainment platform specializing in high-quality erotic filmmaking and photography. Established in 2012, it operates as part of the MetArt Network, offering a large archive of 4K erotic movies and high-resolution photo galleries. The site targets discerning adult audiences seeking tasteful and artistic erotica. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including React, Google Tag Manager, and OneTrust for privacy compliance. It is well-optimized for mobile and desktop users, with good SEO and accessibility features. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and uses standard security headers, but lacks a public security policy or vulnerability disclosure page. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is a notable anomaly that impacts trust and business credibility. Overall, the platform demonstrates strong business maturity and technical competence but should address transparency around domain registration and enhance security communication.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sexart.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
75
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention sexart.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1,876
Employees
0
Customers
1,826
Third parties
50
Weak passwords
32%

15 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for sexart.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

SexArt holds a strong market position within the niche of artistic adult content, leveraging a subscription-based model with extensive multimedia offerings. Its competitive advantage lies in high production values, frequent content updates, and a broad network of related sites and partners. Revenue streams include subscriptions, affiliate marketing, and live cam services. The company maintains active partnerships with payment processors and affiliate networks, enhancing its operational ecosystem. Growth indicators include a large content library, consistent updates, and a loyal subscriber base. Strategic observations suggest opportunities in expanding security transparency and incident response readiness to further solidify market trust.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, use of security headers, and secure handling of user inputs including consent mechanisms. No immediate vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. However, the lack of a public security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms represents a compliance gap. GDPR compliance is supported by a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent management. The missing WHOIS data raises concerns about domain registration transparency, which could affect trustworthiness. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be improved by enhancing transparency and formalizing incident response communication.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and user protections.
  2. Implement a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  3. Provide clear incident response contact information, including abuse and security email addresses.
  4. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Disclose Data Protection Officer contact details to improve GDPR transparency and user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SexArt
Description
SexArt is an innovator in high-caliber erotic filmmaking that elevates scorching sexual exploration to a new level of excellence. It offers cinema-quality adult movies featuring beautiful girls in stellar productions, focusing on authentic arousal and overwhelming pleasure. The site provides a large archive of erotic 4K movies and high-resolution photos, updated frequently with new content. It was launched in 2012 and is part of the MetArt Network.
Key services
Erotic 4K movies, High-resolution photo galleries, Live cams, Newsletter with exclusive content and offers
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, OneTrust Cookie Consent, JW Player, Bootstrap
Frameworks
React
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with consent mechanisms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Mixpanel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
TrafficJunky
Tracking pixels
Mixpanel, OneTrust
Marketing tools
Mixpanel
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia.
  2. Strong branding and consistent design across pages.
  3. Comprehensive privacy and terms policies with GDPR compliance.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  5. No visible security or malware issues in the HTML content.
  6. WHOIS data missing, which is unusual for a commercial site.
  7. Multiple related domains and partner sites indicate a large network.
  8. Active social media presence on Twitter and Reddit.
  9. Age verification and legal compliance statements present.
  10. Use of third-party payment processors (Epoch, Segpay) indicated.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React framework with integration of Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, and OneTrust for privacy compliance. It uses Bootstrap for responsive design and JW Player for video playback. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. The site benefits from CDN usage for static content delivery. There is no detected CMS, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party scripts which require ongoing security monitoring. The absence of WHOIS data is a technical anomaly that should be investigated to ensure domain registration integrity.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sexart.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sexart.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.