Skip to main content

Security report for sex-videos.rodeo

Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf · Media · Iceland

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Sex-Videos.Rodeo is an adult entertainment website specializing in aggregating and streaming a wide variety of pornographic videos across numerous categories and fetishes. The site targets an adult-only audience and offers multilingual support to reach a global user base. It operates primarily on an advertising-supported model, linking to multiple partner adult sites and providing daily updated content. The domain is newly registered in 2024 with privacy protection, which is common in this industry to protect registrant identity. Technically, the website uses a lightweight custom stack with jQuery, autocomplete search, and lazy loading for images. It is hosted via NameCheap and uses HTTPS, but lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC, indicating a basic security posture. The site is moderately optimized for mobile and SEO but lacks privacy and cookie policies, which impacts compliance and user trust. From a security perspective, the site has no visible security policy or incident response documentation beyond an abuse report form and contact email. The absence of security headers and DNSSEC, combined with WHOIS privacy protection, suggests room for improvement in transparency and security best practices. No WAF or blocking mechanisms were detected, and the site content is fully accessible. Overall, the site presents moderate risk due to its adult content nature, lack of privacy compliance, and basic security posture. Strategic improvements in security headers, privacy policies, and transparency would enhance trustworthiness and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sex-videos.rodeo

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates in the adult media sector as a content aggregator, leveraging partnerships with multiple free sex video sites to expand its content offering. Its business model is advertising-driven, relying on traffic to monetize through ad networks such as ExoClick. The multilingual approach indicates targeting of diverse geographic markets, primarily adult consumers seeking explicit content. The domain's recent registration aligns with a new market entrant strategy. The lack of transparent registrant information is typical but reduces credibility. The site’s extensive category list and search functionality provide competitive advantages in user engagement. However, absence of formal privacy and security policies may limit growth in regulated markets.

Security posture

The current security posture is basic. HTTPS is enforced, but no advanced security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) are detected, increasing risk of common web attacks. DNSSEC is not enabled, which could expose DNS spoofing risks. The site collects user input via search and report abuse forms but lacks visible anti-CSRF or input sanitization indicators. WHOIS privacy protection is used, which is common but reduces transparency. No vulnerability disclosure or security policy pages are present. Incident response is limited to an abuse report form and contact email. Overall, the site is vulnerable to moderate security risks and lacks compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit user consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  3. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing attacks.
  4. Develop and publish a formal security policy and vulnerability disclosure program to improve incident response readiness and transparency.
  5. Improve mobile optimization and accessibility features to enhance user experience and SEO performance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf
Description
The website offers a large collection of adult sex videos across numerous categories and fetishes, including popular and niche content. It aggregates videos from third parties and publishes new content daily.
Key services
Adult video streaming, Content aggregation, Search and category browsing
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery, jQuery Autocomplete, Vanilla LazyLoad, Custom JavaScript, CSS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Client transfer prohibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
ExoClick, Magsrv, Orbsrv
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is an adult content aggregator with extensive categories and multilingual support.
  2. No privacy or cookie policy found, indicating poor compliance.
  3. Contact email and abuse report form present but no security or incident response policies.
  4. No security headers or DNSSEC enabled, indicating basic security posture.
  5. Advertising is present via multiple ad networks.
  6. WHOIS data is privacy protected, typical for adult sites.
  7. No CMS or major frameworks detected; custom lightweight tech stack.
  8. Content is explicit adult material with no age gate or warnings.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a custom-built frontend with jQuery and vanilla JavaScript libraries for autocomplete and lazy loading. It relies on external ad networks for monetization and includes multiple external links to partner adult sites. The hosting provider is NameCheap, and the domain is protected by privacy services. Performance is moderate with basic mobile responsiveness. SEO is supported by meta tags and multilingual hreflang links. However, the absence of a CMS or modern frameworks suggests potential technical debt and limited scalability. Security configurations are minimal, lacking DNSSEC and security headers. The site could benefit from modernization using contemporary frameworks and enhanced security practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sex-videos.rodeo. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sex-videos.rodeo.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.