Skip to main content

Security report for sepa.net

GRÜN IT Group GmbH · Finance · Germany

Partial score · DNS & email only

75/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SEPA.net, operated by GRÜN IT Group GmbH, provides an innovative online payment system focused on SEPA direct debit transactions across Europe. The platform enables merchants to integrate payment solutions such as purchase buttons, iFrame/mobile integration, API interfaces for recurring payments, and a WordPress plugin for WooCommerce. The service targets online merchants and buyers seeking seamless, registration-free payment experiences. The website is professionally designed, content-rich, and optimized for mobile devices, reflecting a mature digital presence. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with WooCommerce and employs modern JavaScript libraries and plugins to enhance user experience. The site uses HTTPS with strong SSL encryption and implements security features like transaction TANs and fraud management. However, some security headers are missing, and no explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are published. From a security and compliance perspective, SEPA.net adheres to German data protection laws and GDPR, with clear privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms. Contact information is transparent, but the lack of WHOIS domain registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy. Overall, the site demonstrates a good security posture but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security best practices. Strategically, SEPA.net occupies a niche in the European payment processing market, offering specialized direct debit solutions. The company should prioritize verifying domain registration details, publishing incident response contacts, and implementing additional security headers to strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of sepa.net. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sepa.net

This scan found 14 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
80
After the cap
75

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

SEPA.net operates in the finance and technology sectors, focusing on payment processing services for digital goods and services in Europe. Its competitive advantage lies in offering a direct debit payment method that requires minimal user registration, appealing to merchants seeking easy integration and buyers desiring convenience. Revenue likely derives from transaction fees and service subscriptions. The target customers include online retailers and digital content providers. The company maintains a partnership ecosystem with WordPress and WooCommerce platforms, enhancing market reach. Growth indicators include multi-language support and multiple integration options. The business model emphasizes ease of use, security, and compliance with European data protection standards.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security posture with HTTPS enforced, 256-bit SSL encryption, and transaction TANs for payment authorization. German data protection policies are explicitly mentioned, indicating GDPR compliance. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No public incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available, which could hinder timely reporting and mitigation of security issues. The site uses reputable plugins and frameworks but should regularly audit these for vulnerabilities. Overall, the security maturity is good but can be improved by adopting additional best practices and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish an incident response page or security contact email to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve trust.
  3. Verify and publish domain WHOIS registration details to improve legitimacy and trustworthiness.
  4. Conduct regular security audits of third-party plugins and update them promptly to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
GRÜN IT Group GmbH
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
GRÜN IT Group GmbH
Description
SEPA.net is a service of the GRÜN IT Group GmbH offering an innovative online payment system for Europe-wide immediate purchase, enabling micropayments via direct debit without registration.
Key services
Online direct debit payment processing, Purchase button integration, iFrame & Mobile integration, API interface for recurring payments, WordPress plugin for WooCommerce
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.7.2, WooCommerce 9.7.1, jQuery, MediaElement.js, WPBakery Page Builder, Ultimate VC Addons
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • 256 Bit SSL encryption
  • Security TAN for payment authorization
  • Blacklisting and fraud management mentioned

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
WooCommerce, Contact Form 7, Cookie Notice plugin
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is business-focused on SEPA direct debit payment solutions.
  3. Clear contact information and company details are provided.
  4. No security.txt or explicit incident response information found.
  5. WHOIS data is missing, which reduces trustworthiness score.
  6. Good use of HTTPS and security best practices mentioned on site.
  7. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented and GDPR compliant.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS with WooCommerce for e-commerce functionality. It uses popular JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and MediaElement.js for media playback. The site employs WPBakery Page Builder and Ultimate VC Addons for content layout and styling. Performance is moderate with some optimization potential. Mobile responsiveness is good, and SEO is well addressed with Yoast SEO plugin metadata. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site uses HTTPS with strong SSL but lacks some advanced security headers. Overall, the technical infrastructure is stable and suitable for the business needs but could benefit from performance tuning and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 75/100Medium12 findings · partial scanView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sepa.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sepa.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.