Skip to main content

Security report for seniorgroup.eu

Aprūpe mājās un pansionāti | Senior Group · Healthcare · Latvia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Senior Group is a healthcare service provider specializing in senior care, offering home care, residences, family mail services, and assistance with municipal co-financing vouchers. The company targets seniors and their families primarily in Latvia and Lithuania, positioning itself as a regional player focused on compassionate and supportive care environments. The website is built on a modern WordPress infrastructure using Astra theme and Elementor page builder, enhanced with SEO and analytics tools such as Yoast SEO and Google Analytics. Cookie consent is managed via CookieYes, and live chat support is provided through Zoho SalesIQ. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled, but could benefit from enhanced security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is limited due to missing privacy and terms of service pages. Overall, the website is professional, user-friendly, and trustworthy, with room for improvement in compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching seniorgroup.eu

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention seniorgroup.eu, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for seniorgroup.eu right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the healthcare sector with a focus on senior care services, including residential care and home-based support. Its business model combines direct service provision with real estate investment opportunities in senior residences. The company leverages digital tools for multilingual support and customer engagement, indicating a growth-oriented and customer-centric approach. The presence of career pages suggests active recruitment and team expansion. Market positioning is regional with a clear target audience of seniors and their families. The company maintains a consistent brand presence and uses testimonials to build trust. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified, indicating an independent operation.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented. However, it lacks explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is published, which limits transparency and preparedness. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The use of reputable plugins and hosting by IONOS SE adds to the trustworthiness. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be enhanced by adopting best practices and publishing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Establish and publish an incident response policy and contact channels for security issues.
  4. Conduct regular security audits of plugins and infrastructure to identify and remediate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users, including seniors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Aprūpe mājās un pansionāti | Senior Group
Description
Senior Group provides home care and support services for seniors and their families, including residences, home care, family mail, and assistance with municipal co-financing vouchers.
Key services
Senior residences (pansionāti), Home care services, Family mail service, Voucher and co-financing assistance, Career opportunities in caregiving
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.2, Astra Theme, Elementor 3.30.3, Yoast SEO, Google Analytics, Zoho SalesIQ, CookieYes cookie consent, Weglot translation plugin
Frameworks
WordPress CMS
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent mechanism present
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Zoho SalesIQ, Weglot translation
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented and relevant to senior care services.
  3. No privacy policy or terms of service pages found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented via CookieYes.
  5. Contact information includes a phone number and contact form but no email addresses explicitly found.
  6. Uses modern WordPress CMS with popular plugins and themes.
  7. Security headers could be improved for better protection.
  8. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  10. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.2 with the Astra theme and Elementor page builder, indicating a modern and flexible CMS infrastructure. SEO is supported by Yoast SEO plugin, and multilingual support is provided by Weglot. Analytics and user engagement are managed via Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Zoho SalesIQ live chat. Cookie consent is handled by CookieYes. The site loads a variety of CSS and JS assets from both the site domain and trusted CDNs. Performance is moderate with responsive design and mobile optimization evident. No critical technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and accessibility compliance to further enhance the technical robustness.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with seniorgroup.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review seniorgroup.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.