Skip to main content

Security report for seifi.lv

DATA J&S · Retail · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

DATA J&S operates as a Latvian-based supplier specializing in security equipment including safes, locks, cash handling devices, queue management systems, and security bags and seals. The company targets businesses and offices requiring secure storage and protection solutions. Their website reflects a small-sized business with a professional but straightforward online presence, leveraging WordPress and WooCommerce for e-commerce capabilities. The technical infrastructure includes modern plugins and tracking tools such as Google Analytics and Tag Manager, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data, but lacks advanced security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies, which are compliance gaps. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust verification, but the website content and contact information suggest a legitimate business. Overall, the site is functional and business-focused but would benefit from enhanced security and compliance measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching seifi.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
30
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a niche provider in the security retail sector within Latvia, focusing on safes and related security products. Its business model combines product sales with service offerings, including quality assessment systems. The website content and navigation are clear and targeted towards business customers. The use of multilingual support (qTranslate-X) indicates an intent to serve Latvian, Russian, and English-speaking clients. The company maintains direct contact channels and uses standard e-commerce and marketing tools. However, the lack of visible certifications or detailed business registration information online limits deeper business intelligence insights. The partnership with RDP.LV for website development suggests local collaboration. Growth potential could be enhanced by improving transparency and compliance documentation.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture. HTTPS is properly implemented, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces protection against common web attacks. No explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which could hinder timely security issue reporting and resolution. The use of popular WordPress plugins necessitates regular updates to mitigate vulnerabilities. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies, which is critical under GDPR regulations applicable in Latvia. Overall, while no immediate vulnerabilities are evident from the HTML content, the security posture would benefit from enhanced headers, documented policies, and incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact channels to improve security transparency.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance website accessibility and SEO optimization to improve user experience and search visibility.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
DATA J&S
Description
Supplier of safes, locks, security equipment, cash handling devices, queue management systems, and security bags and seals. Provides service and quality assessment systems. Targeted at businesses and offices requiring security and value storage solutions.
Key services
Safes and locks, Cash handling devices, Queue management equipment, Security bags, packages, and seals, Service and maintenance, Quality assessment system
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Revolution Slider, Contact Form 7, Responsive Lightbox, qTranslate-X, Visual Composer
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (implied by Contact Form 7 and WooCommerce)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is business-focused on security and safes.
  3. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  4. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error, limiting domain trust analysis.
  5. Use of multiple WordPress plugins and Google tracking tools.
  6. Contact information is clearly provided with multiple emails and phone numbers.
  7. No social media links detected.
  8. No explicit security headers found in HTML content.
  9. Website uses HTTPS with valid SSL.
  10. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with WooCommerce for e-commerce functionality. It uses a range of plugins including Contact Form 7 for forms, Revolution Slider for visual content, and qTranslate-X for multilingual support. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are integrated for tracking and marketing analytics. The site loads moderate external resources, including Google Fonts and Font Awesome icons. Performance is moderate with some lazy loading and responsive design features implemented. Accessibility is basic, with some ARIA landmarks and skip links present. SEO is basic with meta tags and canonical links but lacks advanced structured data or Open Graph tags. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the HTML content. Overall, the technical stack is standard for small business websites but could be modernized with improved performance and security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with seifi.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review seifi.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.