Skip to main content

Security report for seekda.com

Seekda · Hospitality · Austria

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

80/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Seekda is a hospitality technology company offering a comprehensive hotel management software ecosystem designed to optimize daily operations, boost revenue, and enhance guest experiences. Their platform includes property management, booking engines, channel management, payment solutions, and AI-driven tools, serving over 3000 hotels primarily in Austria. The website is built on WordPress with modern plugins and integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools, reflecting a mature digital presence. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and reCAPTCHA usage, though some security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is limited due to missing explicit policies. WHOIS data is unavailable, which raises some concerns about domain registration transparency but does not detract from the professional presentation and business legitimacy evident on the site.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of seekda.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
70/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching seekda.com

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
85
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
70
Average
80

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention seekda.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
68
Employees
0
Customers
68
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
13%

5 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for seekda.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Seekda operates in the hospitality sector, targeting hotels, hotel groups, and specialty travel providers with a B2B SaaS model. Their competitive advantage lies in an all-in-one platform that integrates multiple hotel management functions and supports direct bookings and revenue growth. The company emphasizes partnerships and customer success stories, indicating a strong ecosystem and market presence. The website content and structure support a medium-sized enterprise with a focus on technology-driven hospitality solutions. Marketing efforts leverage major ad networks and tracking services, suggesting active customer acquisition and engagement strategies.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with enforced HTTPS, use of Google reCAPTCHA, and integration of reputable analytics and tracking services. However, the absence of several key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options indicates room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of explicit privacy and cookie policies may pose compliance risks under GDPR and related regulations. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available, which could be enhanced to improve transparency and trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements and consent mechanisms.
  2. Add and configure essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy.
  3. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure transparency and trustworthiness.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet WCAG standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Publish security policy and incident response contact information to demonstrate commitment to security and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Seekda
Description
Optimize Your Hotel's Daily Operations With Seekda's Complete Hospitality Ecosystem. From Property Management To Back Office, Our Hotel Management Software Boosts Revenue, Supports Distribution Goals, And Elevates Guest Experiences.
Key services
Hotel Manager (Property Management System), KUBE Booking Engine, Circles (Booking Engines), Channel Manager, Metasearch, Seekda Stay (AI voice assistant), Seekda Pay (Payment solutions), Account Manager & Support, API Connectivity
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Yoast SEO, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity, Google reCAPTCHA, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Boxzilla (popup plugin), Sitepress Multilingual CMS (WPML)
Frameworks
Elementor, Yoast SEO
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for forms
  • Use of security and analytics scripts with integrity and crossorigin attributes
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Microsoft Clarity, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Facebook Ads, LinkedIn Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Google Analytics (via GTM)
Marketing tools
Lemlist
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge detected.
  2. Content is focused on hospitality software solutions with clear business offerings.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages detected in the provided HTML content.
  4. Multiple marketing and analytics tools are integrated, indicating active user tracking.
  5. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found in the visible content.
  6. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which reduces trust in domain registration transparency.
  7. Website uses modern WordPress technologies and plugins with good SEO practices.
  8. No adult or questionable content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using Elementor and Yoast SEO plugins, indicating a modern and flexible CMS environment. It integrates multiple third-party scripts for analytics, marketing, and user interaction tracking, including Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity, and LinkedIn Insight Tag. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. The site uses reCAPTCHA for form security and employs cookie-based tracking for marketing attribution. Technical debt appears low, but security header implementation and privacy compliance require attention to reduce risk and improve trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 79/100Low23 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with seekda.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review seekda.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.