Skip to main content

Security report for seeberg.cz

Hotel a Pension SEEBERG · Hospitality · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Hotel a Pension SEEBERG is a family-run hospitality business located in Františkovy Lázně, Czech Republic, offering accommodation, wellness, dining, and leisure services. The website reflects a well-established small business with a focus on comfort, wellness, and eco-friendly experiences. The company targets tourists, families, and wellness seekers, positioning itself as a romantic and relaxing destination with a 30-year history. Technically, the website uses modern JavaScript libraries and frameworks such as jQuery, OwlCarousel, and Foundation, and integrates Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Google Tag Manager for marketing and analytics. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and rich multimedia content. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and has cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks visible security headers and explicit security or incident response policies. WHOIS data is not publicly available, indicating privacy protection, which is common for small businesses but slightly reduces trust. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with basic privacy regulations, but could improve security posture and transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching seeberg.cz

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the hospitality sector, providing hotel and pension accommodations, wellness services, restaurants, and an eco farm. It has a local market presence with a loyal customer base, as indicated by a loyalty program and a regional award. Revenue streams likely include room bookings, wellness treatments, dining, and related leisure activities. The company maintains active social media channels for marketing and customer engagement. The business model is service-oriented, focusing on quality and customer satisfaction. Partnerships with local entities and service providers are implied but not explicitly detailed. Growth indicators include continuous service improvements and digital presence enhancements. The company appears to be a small-sized entity with a stable market position in its region.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and privacy compliance mechanisms such as cookie consent and a privacy policy. However, it lacks several security best practices including security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, etc.), explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of multiple third-party scripts introduces potential risk vectors that should be regularly audited. The absence of a security.txt file and incident response information indicates limited preparedness for security incidents. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small hospitality business but could be significantly improved to reduce risk and enhance customer trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish explicit security and incident response policies on the website, including contact channels for reporting security issues.
  3. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to identify and remediate vulnerabilities.
  4. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve transparency.
  5. Enhance privacy compliance by detailing data retention policies and providing clearer user data management options.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Hotel a Pension SEEBERG
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Hotel a Pension SEEBERG
Description
The family-run Hotel & Pension Seeberg offers romantic accommodation in Frantiskovy Lazne near Seeberg Castle. Wellness, sauna, swimming pool, playground, eco-farm, educational trail with posted information. The hotel has been improving for 30 years and offers comfortable rooms, restaurants, wellness, and eco-farm experiences.
Key services
Hotel accommodation, Pension accommodation, Wellness and spa services, Restaurant and wine cellar, Eco farm, Leisure and cultural activities
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, OwlCarousel, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Google Maps API, Swiper.js, js.cookie
Frameworks
Foundation
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • IP anonymization in Google Analytics
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, Seznam Retargeting
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia
  2. No WHOIS data available publicly, indicating privacy protection
  3. Clear contact information and multiple communication channels
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policy present indicating GDPR awareness
  5. Use of multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools
  6. No visible security headers detected in HTML content
  7. No terms of service or explicit security policy pages found
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found
  9. Content is family-friendly and safe
  10. Good technical implementation with modern JS libraries and responsive design
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and popular technology stack including jQuery, OwlCarousel, Foundation framework, and Swiper.js for UI components and interactivity. It integrates Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing, along with Google Tag Manager for tag management. The site loads external scripts asynchronously to improve performance. The design is responsive and mobile-friendly, with good SEO meta tags and Open Graph data for social sharing. However, no CMS or hosting provider information is evident. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. Accessibility features are basic but present. The site could benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance tuning to reduce technical debt and improve resilience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with seeberg.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review seeberg.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.