Skip to main content

Security report for see.at

Tourismusverband See · Hospitality · Austria

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.see.at is a professionally developed tourism portal representing the village of See in the Paznaun - Ischgl region of Austria. It targets families and holidaymakers seeking information and booking options for summer and winter holidays. The site offers comprehensive content on activities, events, accommodation, and regional partners, positioning itself as a key regional tourism resource. Technically, the site employs modern web standards, including service workers, responsive design, and integration with third-party booking and analytics services, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and a detailed cookie consent mechanism, though explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not published. Overall, the site is trustworthy, compliant with GDPR, and provides a safe browsing experience for general audiences.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching see.at

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
40
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the hospitality and tourism sector, focusing on regional destination marketing and holiday facilitation. Its market position is that of a regional tourism authority or association, collaborating with neighboring destinations such as Galtür, Ischgl, and Kappl. The business model revolves around providing information, event promotion, and accommodation booking services, likely funded by tourism taxes, partnerships, and service fees. The presence of multiple partner domains and integrated booking systems suggests a well-established partnership ecosystem. The website's content and design reflect a professional approach aimed at families and leisure travelers, supporting growth and customer engagement in the regional tourism market.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security posture with HTTPS enabled and a service worker registered for enhanced performance and offline capabilities. The cookie consent banner is comprehensive, categorizing cookies by purpose and providing opt-out options, aligning with GDPR requirements. However, the absence of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates room for improvement in transparency and preparedness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. Security headers are partially inferred but not explicitly confirmed. Overall, the site maintains good security hygiene but should enhance its security documentation and incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Publish explicit security policies and incident response contact information on the website.
  2. Implement and verify security headers such as X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen protection against common web attacks.
  3. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance contact information visibility, including official emails and phone numbers for customer and security inquiries.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and cookies to ensure compliance and minimize privacy risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Tourismusverband See
Description
The family-friendly village of See in Paznaun offers a variety-packed family holiday all year round.
Key services
Holiday information, Accommodation booking, Event information, Activity and leisure offers
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Service Worker, Flatpickr (date picker), Pimcore CMS (implied by class names and structure), Deskline (accommodation booking integration), DataReporter (cookie consent management)
Frameworks
Bootstrap (CSS classes and grid system), Pimcore (CMS implied)
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Service worker registered
  • Cookie consent with opt-out and detailed categories
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Facebook, Criteo, Bidswitch, Adform
Tracking pixels
Hotjar, TikTok Pixel
Marketing tools
DataReporter cookie consent, TailTarget
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally designed tourism portal for the village of See in Austria.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism with detailed categories and third-party cookies disclosed.
  3. Use of modern web technologies and service workers for enhanced user experience.
  4. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on the analyzed page; contact info likely on other pages.
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies published on the analyzed page.
  6. Multiple external links to regional tourism partners and service providers.
  7. Advertising and tracking are implemented with transparency and user consent.
  8. No signs of suspicious or malicious content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and service workers for progressive web app features. It likely runs on the Pimcore CMS platform, supported by Bootstrap for responsive design. Integration with third-party services such as Deskline for accommodation booking and DataReporter for cookie management indicates a sophisticated infrastructure. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Technical debt appears low, but continuous monitoring of third-party dependencies is recommended to mitigate risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with see.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review see.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.