Skip to main content

Security report for sedical.com

Sedical S.A. · Energy · Spain

Partial score · DNS & email only

50/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Sedical S.A. is a Spanish company specializing in energy efficiency and energy saving solutions, targeting businesses and organizations interested in reducing energy consumption. The website is built on WordPress and uses popular plugins such as Yoast SEO and WP Rocket to optimize SEO and performance. The site is accessible without any WAF or security challenges, indicating good availability. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about the domain's legitimacy and registration status. The website lacks visible privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, which impacts its compliance posture. Security headers and incident response information are also missing, suggesting room for improvement in security practices. Overall, the site presents professional content relevant to its industry but requires enhancements in transparency, security, and compliance to improve trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube, Cloudflare, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sedical.com

This scan found 12 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
65
Average
50

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention sedical.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
285
Employees
7
Customers
259
Third parties
19
Weak passwords
22%

Latest record dated 2026-01-13 · 17 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for sedical.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –sedical.com2026-01-13
  • –sedical.com2026-01-11
  • –clientes.sedical.com2025-11-12
  • –clientes.sedical.com2025-11-12
  • –clientes.sedical.com2025-09-19

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Sedical S.A. operates in the energy sector, focusing on providing energy efficiency consulting and solutions. The business model appears to be B2B, serving organizations aiming to optimize energy usage. The website content is well-structured and professionally presented, supporting a medium-sized company profile. The lack of detailed business registration and contact information limits the ability to fully assess market positioning and partnerships. The company targets Spanish-speaking markets with multilingual support for Portuguese and English, indicating an intent to reach broader audiences. The use of standard WordPress technologies and SEO tools suggests a moderate level of digital maturity.

Security posture

The website currently exhibits a basic security posture. HTTPS is presumably enabled (inferred from resource URLs using HTTPS), but no explicit security headers were detected in the HTML content. There is no evidence of privacy or cookie policies, nor incident response contacts, which are critical for GDPR compliance and user trust. The absence of WHOIS data and registrant information further reduces confidence in domain legitimacy. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were identified in the provided content. To enhance security posture, the company should implement comprehensive security headers, publish privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms, and provide clear incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Register the domain properly and ensure WHOIS information is accurate and publicly available to improve legitimacy.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance and user consent mechanisms.
  3. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  4. Add clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer support and incident response.
  5. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Sedical S.A.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Sedical S.A.
Description
Sedical S.A. is a company focused on energy efficiency and energy saving solutions.
Key services
Energy efficiency consulting, Energy saving solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, WP Rocket, Revolution Slider, Google Fonts, FontAwesome, Icomoon
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
50/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO, WP Rocket
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  2. WHOIS data is missing or domain is unregistered, which is unusual for an active business website.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the homepage HTML content.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet.
  5. Website uses WordPress with common SEO and performance plugins.
  6. No explicit security headers or policies detected in the HTML content.
  7. No social media links or external business contact points found in the HTML snippet.
  8. Content is in Spanish with alternate language links for Portuguese and English.
  9. Website focuses on energy efficiency solutions.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with popular plugins like Yoast SEO for search engine optimization and WP Rocket for performance enhancement. It uses web fonts from Google Fonts and icon fonts such as FontAwesome and Icomoon. The site appears to be moderately optimized for mobile devices and SEO, with proper meta viewport tags and alternate language links. However, no advanced frameworks or hosting provider details were identified. Performance is moderate, with some optimization through caching plugins. Accessibility features are basic, and no ARIA roles or landmarks were detected in the provided HTML snippet. The technical infrastructure is standard for a medium-sized business website but could benefit from enhanced security and compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sedical.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sedical.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.