Skip to main content

Security report for security-insider.de

Security-Insider · Media · Germany

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

82/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Security-Insider is a German-language online magazine specializing in cybersecurity topics such as ransomware, phishing, critical infrastructure protection, encryption, data protection, GDPR, patches, zero-day exploits, and zero trust. It serves IT security professionals and decision makers with news, analysis, webinars, whitepapers, podcasts, and special reports. The website is professionally designed with consistent branding and good content quality, targeting a specialized audience in the cybersecurity media sector. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript, lazy loading, Google Tag Manager, and a GDPR-compliant consent management platform, hosted likely on infrastructure associated with Vogel IT-Medien GmbH. Security posture is good with HTTPS and consent management, but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies. No direct contact or incident response information is found, which could be improved for better trust and compliance. Overall, the site is safe, accessible, and trustworthy with moderate to good technical and privacy compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      SSL Certificate Expires Soon

      SSL certificate expires in 16 days

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration

      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching security-insider.de

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
85
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
85
Average
82

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention security-insider.de, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
243
Employees
0
Customers
243
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
9%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for security-insider.de.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website positions itself as a specialized cybersecurity media outlet in the German market, offering a variety of content formats including news, whitepapers, webinars, podcasts, and IT awards. Its business model relies on advertising, sponsored content, and educational offerings. The presence of Vogel IT-Medien domains and infrastructure suggests it is part of a larger media group. The target customers are cybersecurity professionals and organizations seeking up-to-date security information and compliance guidance. The site demonstrates a mature digital presence with integrated consent management and advertising networks. However, the lack of explicit contact and security policies may limit some business credibility aspects. The partnership with Vogel IT Akademie indicates a broader ecosystem for IT education and media.

Security posture

Security-Insider employs HTTPS and a GDPR-compliant consent management platform, indicating a baseline of security and privacy awareness. The site does not expose sensitive data or use vulnerable libraries in the visible HTML. However, it lacks explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended best practices. No published security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms were found, which are important for transparency and trust. The site’s advertising and tracking are consent-based, aligning with GDPR requirements. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by publishing security policies and implementing additional HTTP security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the homepage.
  2. Add explicit HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for general and security incident inquiries.
  4. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file to improve transparency.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all users.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Security-Insider
Description
Online magazine focused on cybersecurity topics including ransomware, phishing, critical infrastructure protection (KRITIS), encryption, data protection, GDPR, patches, zero-day exploits, and zero trust.
Key services
Cybersecurity news and analysis, Whitepapers, Webinars, Podcasts, IT awards, E-books and special reports
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Publisher Tags (GPT), Consentmanager.net CMP, Lazy loading scripts, SCSS/CSS, Responsive design
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Consent management for GDPR
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No obvious vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google AdSense, Google DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
Google Publisher Tags
Marketing tools
Consentmanager.net CMP
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional German cybersecurity online magazine.
  2. Content is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security challenges.
  3. Strong use of GDPR-compliant consent management.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found in provided content.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in HTML content.
  6. Advertising is managed via Google AdSense and DoubleClick with consent.
  7. Technical implementation uses modern JavaScript and lazy loading.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy detected.
  9. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  10. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript stack with lazy loading and responsive design, ensuring good mobile optimization and user experience. Google Tag Manager and Google Publisher Tags are used for analytics and advertising, integrated with a GDPR-compliant consent management platform. The site is hosted on infrastructure associated with Vogel IT-Medien, with DNS servers from Deutsche Telekom and Vogel domains. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. No explicit CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary solution. SEO is supported by structured JSON-LD data and Open Graph tags. The site lacks some security headers and explicit accessibility features, which are areas for technical improvement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with security-insider.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review security-insider.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.