Skip to main content

Security report for scream.se

Scream Mediabyrå AB · Media · Sweden

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

44/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Scream Mediabyrå AB is a Swedish media agency specializing in effective communication and media planning, connecting advertisers with their target audiences through strategic channels. The company positions itself as a creative and passionate partner in a complex media landscape, serving a broad Nordic market with over 20 years of experience and multiple industry awards. Their business model focuses on delivering measurable business value beyond traditional media plans. Technically, the website is built on the Webflow platform, leveraging modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager and a consent management platform to ensure GDPR compliance. The site is well-optimized for mobile and SEO, with good design and user experience. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and consent management but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies, indicating room for improvement in security transparency and incident response readiness. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with privacy regulations, reflecting a mature digital presence for a medium-sized media agency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching scream.se

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
44

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Scream holds a strong market position in the Nordic media agency sector, supported by a reputable client base and multiple awards. Their affiliation with the Media Family group and sister companies Loudly, The Foundation, and Scream B2B enhances their service ecosystem. The company targets businesses seeking strategic media and communication services, leveraging a business model centered on media planning and marketing consultancy. The website content and structure indicate a focus on brand consistency and client trust, with clear contact points and social media engagement. Growth indicators include a sizable employee base and a broad client portfolio. The recruitment subdomain suggests active talent acquisition, supporting business expansion.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to strong security posture with HTTPS enforced and a consent management platform for cookie and privacy compliance. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security hardening. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact channels indicates limited transparency in security governance. GDPR compliance is supported by a privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for the business type but could be enhanced by adopting additional security best practices and formalizing incident response procedures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to improve site security.
  2. Publish a formal security policy and incident response information to enhance transparency and trust.
  3. Create and host a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve security communication.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerabilities are introduced.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Scream Mediabyrå AB
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Scream Mediabyrå AB
Description
Scream is a media agency focused on effective communication, connecting advertisers with the right audience at the right time through passionate communication and media expertise. They create business value beyond media plans in a complex media landscape.
Key services
Media planning, Communication strategy, Marketing consultancy
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow, Google Tag Manager, Consentmanager.net CMP, jQuery 3.5.1, Google Fonts
Frameworks
Webflow
Platforms
Webflow CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Consent management platform implemented
  • Google Tag Manager used for controlled script loading

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Consentmanager.net
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich
  2. Strong presence of client logos and awards indicating market credibility
  3. Consent management implemented for GDPR compliance
  4. No explicit terms of service or security policy found
  5. Contact information is comprehensive and clearly presented
  6. No visible security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data
  7. Use of modern web technologies and CMS (Webflow)
  8. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Webflow CMS platform, utilizing modern front-end technologies such as jQuery and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. The use of a consent management platform ensures GDPR compliance. Hosting is via Webflow's CDN, providing reliable performance and HTTPS support. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO metadata. However, the site lacks advanced accessibility features and explicit security headers. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in loading speed by optimizing scripts and assets. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, suitable for a medium-sized media agency's digital presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with scream.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review scream.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.