Skip to main content

Security report for scoresinlive.com

ScoresinLive.com · Media · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ScoresinLive.com operates as a niche media website providing live sports scores and results across multiple sports, with a strong focus on soccer. The site aggregates data from various sources to deliver fast and detailed live scores for global sports leagues and competitions. Its target audience primarily consists of sports enthusiasts seeking real-time updates. The business model appears to be advertising-supported, leveraging multiple ad networks and tracking technologies to monetize traffic. Technically, the website employs a modern JavaScript stack including Prebid.js for header bidding, Google Tag Manager, and various ad network integrations. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and uses HTTPS for secure connections. However, it lacks advanced security headers and visible CMS or hosting provider information, indicating potential areas for technical improvement. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates basic compliance with privacy regulations through a consent management platform and anonymized analytics tracking. Nonetheless, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and trustworthiness. No explicit security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are published, which limits transparency and security maturity. Overall, ScoresinLive.com is a functional and content-rich sports media site with moderate technical and privacy compliance maturity. The primary risks relate to domain registration opacity and limited security policy disclosures. Strategic improvements in security posture and business transparency would enhance trust and resilience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching scoresinlive.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ScoresinLive.com occupies a specialized niche in the sports media sector, focusing on live score aggregation for multiple sports worldwide. Its competitive advantage lies in providing fast, detailed live updates, especially for soccer, which is the most popular sport globally. The business model relies heavily on advertising revenue, supported by integration with multiple major ad networks and real-time bidding platforms. The target customer segment includes global sports fans and bettors who demand timely score information. The site has maintained an online presence since 2008, indicating some longevity, though the lack of WHOIS data clouds domain ownership clarity. The partnership ecosystem includes major ad tech providers but no clear business partnerships or subsidiaries are identified. Growth indicators are limited by the absence of direct contact information and formal business disclosures.

Security posture

The website exhibits a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and a consent management platform for GDPR compliance. Google Analytics is configured with IP anonymization, reflecting privacy awareness. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces protection against common web attacks. No security.txt or incident response information is provided, limiting the ability to report vulnerabilities or incidents. The absence of WHOIS registration data is a significant red flag, potentially indicating privacy protection or domain registration issues. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analysis. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be significantly improved by adopting best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against web attacks.
  2. Publish a security.txt file and incident response policy to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve transparency.
  3. Obtain and display clear domain registration information to improve trust and legitimacy perception.
  4. Add direct company contact emails and phone numbers on the website to enhance business credibility and user trust.
  5. Develop and publish a terms of service page to clarify user rights and obligations, supporting legal compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ScoresinLive.com
Description
ScoresinLive.com livescore service provides live scores and final results from multiple sources for all main sports including soccer, basketball, tennis, ice hockey, baseball, and American football. It offers detailed live scores especially for soccer leagues worldwide.
Key services
live sports scores, final results, sports news aggregation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Prebid.js, Google Tag Manager, Font Awesome, Icomoon, Google Analytics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Consent management platform implemented
  • IP anonymization in Google Analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Toplist.cz, Toplist.sk
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
InMobi, Google AdSense/DoubleClick, AppNexus, Rubicon Project, PubMatic, Sharethrough, OpenX, Lijit
Tracking pixels
Toplist.cz, Toplist.sk
Marketing tools
Consent Management Platform (InMobi CMP)
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website provides comprehensive live sports scores with detailed soccer coverage.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual for an active .com domain.
  3. Privacy and cookie policies are implemented with a consent management platform.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found; only a contact page link.
  5. Multiple third-party ad and tracking services are integrated.
  6. No security.txt or explicit security policies published.
  7. No terms of service page detected.
  8. Website uses HTTPS but lacks visible security headers.
  9. No signs of adult or explicit content; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript-based front end with integration of Prebid.js for programmatic advertising and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing tags. It leverages multiple third-party ad networks and tracking services, indicating a complex ad tech stack. The site is mobile responsive and includes SEO best practices such as meta tags and Open Graph data. However, no CMS or hosting provider information is evident, and no advanced web frameworks were detected. Performance is moderate with some potential latency due to multiple external scripts. Accessibility features are basic, and no ARIA landmarks or enhanced accessibility attributes were found. The technical debt appears manageable but could benefit from security header implementation and performance optimization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with scoresinlive.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review scoresinlive.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.