Skip to main content

Security report for schroederelektrotechnik.de

Schröder Elektrotechnik · Energy · Germany

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Schröder Elektrotechnik is a regional electrical services company operating primarily in Rellingen, Holstein, and Hamburg, Germany. The company offers services including lighting, electrical installations, household appliances, and environmental technology catering to both private and commercial clients. The website reflects a small-sized local business with a clear focus on its target audience and service offerings. The digital infrastructure is built on WordPress CMS, utilizing modern technologies such as Bootstrap, jQuery, and FontAwesome, complemented by plugins for cookie consent and portfolio management. The site is optimized for mobile devices and demonstrates good SEO practices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced, standard security headers present, and no exposed sensitive data. Privacy compliance is well addressed with a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements. However, the site lacks explicit terms of service and security policy pages, and contact information is limited to an email address and contact form without phone or physical address details. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy digital presence for a local electrical services provider.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching schroederelektrotechnik.de

This scan found 23 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
100
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a trusted local electrical services provider in the German market, focusing on residential and commercial customers in specific regions. Its business model revolves around direct service delivery rather than e-commerce or large-scale operations. The integration of customer review platforms and adherence to GDPR compliance indicate a customer-centric approach and regulatory awareness. The use of Matomo analytics suggests a preference for privacy-conscious data collection. The absence of extensive contact details or certifications may limit perceived credibility for some users, but the consistent branding and professional website design support a positive market presence. No partnerships or subsidiaries are explicitly identified, indicating an independent operation.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with HTTPS enabled and multiple security headers implemented, including HSTS, X-Content-Type-Options, and Content-Security-Policy. The cookie consent mechanism is robust, using a recognized plugin that documents user consent in compliance with GDPR. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive information were detected in the HTML content. However, the lack of a dedicated security policy or incident response contact information suggests room for improvement in transparency and preparedness. The site uses up-to-date libraries and plugins, reducing the risk of known vulnerabilities. Overall, the security maturity is appropriate for a small local business but could be enhanced with formal policies and disclosure mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Develop and publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and user protections.
  2. Add explicit incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Regularly audit and update all plugins and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.
  5. Consider implementing a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Schröder Elektrotechnik
Description
Ihr Elektriker für Beleuchtung, Elektroinstallation, Hausgeräte und Umwelttechnik in Rellingen, Holstein und Hamburg für Privat & Gewerbe
Key services
Beleuchtung, Elektroinstallation, Hausgeräte, Umwelttechnik
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Bootstrap, jQuery, FontAwesome, Matomo Analytics, Real Cookie Banner plugin, Visual Portfolio plugin, Google Fonts, Google Maps
Frameworks
Bootstrap 4
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
Real Cookie Banner
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional local electrical services provider in Germany
  2. Uses WordPress CMS with common plugins for cookie consent and portfolio display
  3. Implements GDPR compliant privacy and cookie policies
  4. No visible security or privacy red flags
  5. No terms of service or explicit security policy pages found
  6. Contact information is limited to email and contact form; no phone or physical address explicitly found in HTML
  7. Good SEO and social media integration via Facebook link
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress platform using Bootstrap 4 for responsive design and jQuery for interactivity. It employs FontAwesome for icons and integrates Google Fonts and Google Maps for enhanced user experience. The use of Matomo analytics indicates a privacy-focused approach to user tracking. The site loads multiple CSS and JS assets, some from external CDNs, which may impact performance but are standard practice. The cookie consent is managed by a specialized plugin that supports granular user choices and documents consent. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly with appropriate meta tags and Open Graph data. No critical technical debt or outdated technologies were identified, though performance is moderate and could benefit from optimization. Hosting provider details are not explicitly available from the data.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with schroederelektrotechnik.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review schroederelektrotechnik.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.