Skip to main content

Security report for schollenberger.at

SCHOLLENBERGER Kampfmittelbergung GmbH · Energy · Austria

Critical risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

23/100

Risk levelCritical

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SCHOLLENBERGER Kampfmittelbergung GmbH is a specialized service provider in ordnance and explosive material recovery operating primarily in Austria and Germany. Established in 2009 and employing around 380 staff, the company offers comprehensive services including surface and depth probing, aerial image evaluation, and diving operations. It is part of the SOCOTEC Group, which enhances its market position and operational capabilities. The website presents detailed business information and service descriptions targeting industrial, governmental, and private clients requiring ordnance clearance and related environmental services. Technically, the site is built on TYPO3 CMS with modern frontend libraries but suffers from critical security shortcomings such as lack of HTTPS and DNS misconfigurations. These issues undermine trust and expose the site to risks. No privacy or cookie consent mechanisms are implemented, which may affect GDPR compliance. Overall, the business is credible and professional, but the digital infrastructure requires urgent security and technical improvements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching schollenberger.at

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
50
DNS health
50
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
0
Average
23

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a strong position in the ordnance clearance sector in Austria and Germany, leveraging its affiliation with SOCOTEC Group. Its business model focuses on specialized environmental and safety services with a broad client base including industry and government. The website content and job postings indicate a medium-sized enterprise with a skilled workforce. The lack of DNS records and SSL certificate suggests possible operational or hosting issues that could impact customer trust and business continuity. The company should prioritize resolving these technical issues to maintain competitive advantage and regulatory compliance. The partnership with SOCOTEC provides strategic benefits and access to a wider market and resources.

Security posture

The website's security posture is weak due to the absence of HTTPS, no valid SSL certificate, missing security headers, and lack of DNS security features such as DNSSEC and CAA records. These deficiencies expose users to risks including data interception and domain spoofing. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, indicating limited security governance transparency. The site does not implement cookie consent or privacy compliance mechanisms, which is a compliance gap under GDPR. Immediate remediation is required to secure communications, protect user data, and demonstrate security maturity. The current security score is low, reflecting these critical vulnerabilities.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Configure DNS records properly including A/AAAA, MX, NS, TXT, and enable DNSSEC and CAA for domain security.
  3. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to mitigate common web attacks.
  4. Add a cookie consent banner and privacy compliance mechanisms to meet GDPR requirements.
  5. Publish security and incident response policies including vulnerability disclosure and contact channels to improve transparency and trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SCHOLLENBERGER Kampfmittelbergung GmbH
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by TYPO3 CMS with a modern frontend stack including Bootstrap, jQuery, Owl Carousel, and Revolution Slider. However, the absence of DNS A/AAAA records is a critical technical flaw that may cause accessibility and reliability issues. The site lacks HTTPS support, which is a major security and trust concern. Performance data indicates zero load time and resource count, suggesting incomplete or inaccurate performance measurement. Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility and SEO are basic. The technical debt includes missing security configurations and potential hosting misconfigurations. Addressing these issues will improve operational stability, security posture, and user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with schollenberger.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review schollenberger.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.