Skip to main content

Security report for schiller.ch

SCHILLER AG · Healthcare · Switzerland

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SCHILLER AG is a well-established Swiss medical technology company specializing in innovative diagnostic and emergency care products. The company targets healthcare professionals across various sectors including hospitals, general practice, paramedics, and public health. Their product portfolio includes diagnostics, emergency care and resuscitation devices, patient monitoring systems, diagnostic algorithms, and connectivity solutions. The website reflects a mature digital presence with a professional design, clear navigation, and comprehensive content tailored to their audience. Technically, the site leverages modern JavaScript frameworks, consent management tools, and integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics, indicating a moderate to advanced digital infrastructure. Security-wise, the website enforces HTTPS, uses cookie consent mechanisms, and does not expose sensitive data, though it lacks explicit security policy and incident response pages. Overall, the domain registration data aligns well with the company's Swiss origin and history, supporting the site's legitimacy.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching schiller.ch

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
53
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

SCHILLER AG holds a strong market position as a Swiss innovator in medical technology with over 50 years of experience. Their business model focuses on manufacturing and global distribution through subsidiaries and partners. The company emphasizes quality, innovation, and user-centric design in their products. Their target customers are healthcare providers requiring reliable diagnostic and emergency care equipment. The website's content and structure support their brand positioning and provide clear pathways for product exploration and contact. The presence of social media channels and extranet portals indicates an engaged partner and customer ecosystem. No suspicious or unverified domains are linked, reinforcing trust. The company appears to maintain a solid reputation and professional online presence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with HTTPS enforced and a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. No security headers were explicitly detected in the provided data, and no dedicated security or incident response pages were found, which are areas for improvement. The use of third-party scripts like Google Tag Manager and CookieFirst is standard but requires ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. No exposed sensitive information or vulnerabilities were identified in the HTML content. The absence of a security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy suggests limited transparency in security incident handling. Overall, the site is secure for users but could enhance its security maturity by publishing explicit policies and implementing additional security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Add an incident response contact channel such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Implement and configure security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SCHILLER AG
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SCHILLER AG
Description
SCHILLER is a Swiss company specializing in innovative medical technology, focusing on diagnostics and saving lives. They offer products in diagnostics, emergency care & resuscitation, patient monitoring, diagnostic algorithms, and connectivity.
Key services
Medical diagnostics devices, Emergency care and resuscitation equipment, Patient monitoring systems, Diagnostic algorithms, Connectivity solutions
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Vimeo Player API, Google Tag Manager, CookieFirst Consent Management, Alpine.js (x-data attributes)
Frameworks
Alpine.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
CookieFirst Consent Management
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Clear and comprehensive privacy and cookie policies are present.
  3. Contact information is prominently displayed and complete.
  4. No signs of security blocking or WAF challenges.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and consent management.
  6. Social media presence on major platforms.
  7. No visible security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern tech stack including Alpine.js for interactivity, Vimeo for video content, Google Tag Manager for analytics, and CookieFirst for consent management. The CMS appears to be Pimcore, which is a robust enterprise content management system. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by video content and multiple external scripts. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with more ARIA attributes and semantic HTML enhancements. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and structured data. Hosting details are not explicit but the presence of HTTPS and external services suggests a professionally managed infrastructure. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional and user-friendly experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with schiller.ch. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review schiller.ch.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.