Skip to main content

Security report for scania.com

Scania CV AB (publ) · Transportation · Sweden

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Scania CV AB operates a comprehensive corporate website showcasing its leadership in transport solutions, including trucks, buses, and sustainable e-mobility offerings. The company targets businesses and professionals in heavy transport sectors globally, emphasizing innovation, sustainability, and safety. The website is professionally designed with rich content, clear navigation, and consistent branding, reflecting Scania's enterprise-level stature and global presence. Technically, the site leverages Adobe Experience Manager CMS and modern JavaScript libraries, with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. However, the absence of a valid SSL certificate and HTTPS implementation significantly weakens the security posture, exposing users to risks and undermining trust. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, the site is highly credible but requires urgent security improvements to align with best practices.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of scania.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching scania.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
55
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Scania holds a strong market position as a global leader in heavy transport solutions, supported by a broad portfolio of trucks, buses, and integrated transport services. The business model combines manufacturing with extensive service offerings, including e-mobility and vehicle support. The website content highlights strategic initiatives like electrification and sustainability commitments, indicating growth focus areas. The company maintains active engagement through social media and customer portals, enhancing customer experience and brand loyalty. The domain registration and WHOIS data confirm legitimacy and consistency with corporate identity, reinforcing trust. Scania's partnership ecosystem includes internal services like my.scania.com and lifestyle webshop, supporting diversified revenue streams.

Security posture

The website's security posture is currently weak due to the lack of a valid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols, resulting in no HTTPS protection. While some security headers are present, critical best practices like HSTS enforcement, OCSP stapling, and session resumption are missing. No evidence of incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies was found, indicating potential gaps in security governance. The presence of HttpOnly and Secure cookie flags and content security policies are positive but insufficient to mitigate the fundamental risk of unencrypted traffic. This exposes the site and its users to interception and man-in-the-middle attacks, which is a critical issue for a global enterprise.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate immediately to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Enable and enforce modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 or TLS 1.3) and disable insecure protocols.
  3. Configure HSTS with includeSubDomains and preload to protect users from protocol downgrade attacks.
  4. Implement OCSP stapling and session resumption to improve security and performance.
  5. Develop and publish a security policy and vulnerability disclosure program to enhance transparency and incident response readiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Scania CV AB (publ)
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Adobe Experience Manager CMS, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Handlebars, and integrates Adobe Launch for analytics and OneTrust for cookie consent management. The hosting appears to be via Fastly CDN, indicated by IP addresses and cache headers. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and prefetching of fonts for performance. SEO is well addressed with meta tags, Open Graph data, and canonical URLs. However, performance metrics were not available, and the lack of SSL impacts overall technical robustness. Accessibility features are basic but present. The site uses structured navigation and dynamic menus for user experience. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern but requires security upgrades to meet enterprise standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 81/100Low26 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with scania.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review scania.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.