Skip to main content

Security report for scania.com

Scania CV AB (publ) · Transportation · Sweden

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Scania CV AB is a globally recognized leader in the transportation sector, specializing in manufacturing trucks, buses, and providing comprehensive transport solutions for heavy transport applications. The company operates a professional and well-branded corporate website that serves business clients and stakeholders worldwide. The site is built on Adobe Experience Manager, leveraging modern web technologies and includes robust privacy and cookie consent mechanisms, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and no visible vulnerabilities, though some security headers could be improved. The absence of public WHOIS data is likely due to privacy or registry policies and does not detract from the site's legitimacy. Overall, the website reflects a high level of professionalism and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching scania.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
55
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Scania holds a strong market position as a provider of heavy transport vehicles and related services. Its business model focuses on manufacturing and servicing trucks and buses, targeting logistics companies and transport operators globally. The company maintains a partner ecosystem including customer portals and lifestyle webshops, enhancing customer engagement. The website content and structure indicate a focus on corporate communication, investor relations, and customer support. The digital presence supports Scania's enterprise scale and global reach, with clear branding and consistent messaging.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and implements cookie consent compliant with GDPR, indicating good privacy practices. However, explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not evident in the provided content. Security headers are not explicitly detected, suggesting room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. The security score is strong but could be enhanced by publishing formal security policies and improving HTTP header configurations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact page.
  2. Add and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Provide explicit contact information for security incidents (e.g., security@scania.com).
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance transparency by publishing a vulnerability disclosure or bug bounty program.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Scania CV AB (publ)
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Scania CV AB (publ)
Description
Scania is a world-leading provider of transport solutions, including trucks and buses for heavy transport applications combined with an extensive product-related service offering.
Key services
Trucks, Buses, Transport solutions, Product-related services
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Adobe Helix RUM, jQuery, Handlebars, Typeahead, OneTrust Cookie Consent, Adobe Launch (Tag Manager)
Frameworks
Adobe Experience Manager (AEM)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Adobe Analytics (via Adobe Launch)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Adobe Launch
Marketing tools
Adobe Launch, OneTrust Cookie Consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is professional, well-structured, and comprehensive.
  3. Strong privacy and cookie consent mechanisms are implemented.
  4. WHOIS data is unavailable publicly, but website legitimacy is high.
  5. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and Adobe Experience Manager CMS.
  7. Contact phone number clearly provided in meta tags.
  8. No explicit security policy or incident response contact found on provided content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Adobe Experience Manager, using modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Handlebars, and Typeahead for dynamic content and search functionality. Performance is moderate with prefetching of fonts and asynchronous loading of scripts. The site is mobile optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices including meta tags and Open Graph data. Cookie consent is managed via OneTrust, integrated with Adobe Launch for analytics. Hosting provider details are not explicit but likely enterprise-grade. Technical risks are minimal, though security header implementation could be improved.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 54/100Medium26 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with scania.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review scania.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.