Skip to main content

Security report for saturn.de

Retail · Germany

High risk. 19 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 1 other check.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.saturn.de is currently inaccessible due to a Cloudflare Web Application Firewall (WAF) challenge page employing Turnstile captcha verification. This security mechanism blocks direct access to the site's content, preventing extraction of business, privacy, or contact information. Saturn.de is a large retail domain operating in Germany, likely part of a major electronics and consumer goods retail chain, inferred from domain and hosting infrastructure. The technical infrastructure leverages Akamai CDN and Cloudflare security services, indicating a mature and enterprise-grade setup. However, due to the blocking, no detailed content or metadata is available for analysis. Security posture is difficult to assess fully, but the presence of Cloudflare WAF suggests proactive security measures. Overall, the site is legitimate but currently inaccessible for detailed security and compliance evaluation.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of saturn.de. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

19 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: Telnet

      Port 23 (Telnet) is publicly accessible - Telnet - Unencrypted remote access

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to Telnet using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: SMB

      Port 445 (SMB) is publicly accessible - SMB - Windows file sharing, high risk

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to SMB using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MSSQL

      Port 1433 (MSSQL) is publicly accessible - MSSQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MSSQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: Oracle

      Port 1521 (Oracle) is publicly accessible - Oracle - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to Oracle using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching saturn.de

This scan found 31 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
70
Email security
82
DNS health
70
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
55
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention saturn.de, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
77,195
Employees
7
Customers
77,072
Third parties
116
Weak passwords
6%

Latest record dated 2026-04-24 · 25 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for saturn.de.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –saturn.de2026-04-24
  • –www.saturn.de2026-04-20
  • –saturn.de2026-03-20
  • –saturn.de2025-11-28
  • –saturn.de2025-11-12

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Saturn.de is a prominent retail domain in Germany, presumably serving a broad consumer electronics market. The domain uses enterprise-level CDN and security providers, indicating a significant market presence and investment in infrastructure. The business model likely revolves around e-commerce and physical retail sales of electronics and related products. No direct business details, partnerships, or subsidiaries could be extracted due to content blocking. The domain's use of Akamai and Cloudflare aligns with large-scale retail operations requiring high availability and security. Growth indicators and competitive positioning cannot be assessed from the blocked content.

Security posture

The website employs Cloudflare's WAF with Turnstile captcha, demonstrating a strong perimeter defense against automated attacks and bots. However, the lack of accessible content prevents verification of security headers, SSL configuration, or vulnerability disclosures. No privacy or cookie policies were detected on the challenge page, indicating these are likely on subsequent pages post-challenge. Incident response contacts and security policies are not visible. The security posture appears robust at the network edge but cannot be fully evaluated internally. Recommendations include ensuring transparency of privacy and security policies once access is granted.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a user-friendly challenge page that allows partial access to privacy and legal policies without captcha to improve compliance visibility.
  2. Ensure privacy and cookie policies are easily accessible and GDPR compliant on publicly reachable pages.
  3. Publish security and incident response policies to enhance trust and transparency.
  4. Conduct regular security header and SSL configuration audits to maintain best practices.
  5. Consider providing a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy to encourage responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Cloudflare detected. Page is a Cloudflare security challenge with Turnstile captcha, blocking direct content access. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor

Technology

Stack
Cloudflare Turnstile

Analytics and tracking

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is blocked by Cloudflare WAF challenge page.
  2. No actual business content or metadata available due to blocking.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms policies detected on this page.
  4. No contact information or forms accessible.
  5. Technical infrastructure uses Akamai CDN and Cloudflare security services.
  6. No security headers or SSL details available from provided data.
  7. No analytics or advertising scripts detected beyond Cloudflare challenge.
  8. No social media or external business links found in the HTML content.
  9. Logo is embedded as base64 SVG data URI in the challenge page.
  10. WHOIS data shows multiple Akamai nameservers, consistent with enterprise CDN usage.
Technical notes

Notes

The technical infrastructure is based on Akamai CDN and Cloudflare security services, indicating a modern and scalable platform. The presence of Cloudflare Turnstile captcha suggests advanced bot mitigation strategies. No CMS or specific frameworks could be identified due to content blocking. Performance and SEO optimization cannot be assessed. The embedded logo is delivered as a base64 SVG, which is efficient for quick rendering. The site is likely mobile optimized given the viewport meta tag, but this cannot be confirmed. Overall, the technical setup is enterprise-grade but inaccessible for deeper analysis.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 49/100High41 findingsView report
  2. 49/100High33 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with saturn.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review saturn.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.