Skip to main content

Security report for satakunnanhyvinvointialue.fi

Satakunnan hyvinvointialue · Healthcare · Finland

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Satakunnan hyvinvointialue is a Finnish regional welfare area authority focused on promoting wellbeing, safety, and health for residents of the Satakunta region. Established in 2021, it provides a broad range of healthcare and social services including hospital care, elderly services, mental health, and digital service access. The website serves as an official portal for residents and professionals, offering comprehensive information and digital interaction channels. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern frontend enhancements and integrates privacy-conscious analytics via Matomo. Security posture is solid with HTTPS, security headers, and cookie consent mechanisms, though DNSSEC and explicit security policies could be improved. Overall, the domain registration and website content are consistent and trustworthy, reflecting a legitimate public sector entity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No DMARC record found

      DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

      What to do: Add DMARC record: "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@yourdomain.com"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching satakunnanhyvinvointialue.fi

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
80
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates as a government healthcare and welfare provider in Finland, targeting regional residents and clients. Its business model is public sector service delivery funded by government budgets. The website supports multiple service categories and digital engagement, indicating a mature digital presence. Partnerships include subdomains and external digital service providers. The entity is positioned as a key regional player in healthcare and social welfare, with a focus on accessibility and comprehensive service coverage. Growth indicators include active communication channels and recent content updates. The website's structured data and clear navigation support user engagement and transparency.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with enforced HTTPS, presence of key security headers, and cookie consent aligned with GDPR. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analysis. However, the absence of DNSSEC and a published security policy or incident response contacts are gaps. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is present, which could improve transparency and incident handling readiness. The use of Matomo analytics suggests privacy-aware tracking practices. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a public sector website but could benefit from enhanced transparency and DNS security.

Recommendations

  1. Implement DNSSEC to enhance domain name system security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Provide direct contact emails or phone numbers for security incidents to improve response capabilities.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Satakunnan hyvinvointialue
Registration number
3221304-3
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Satakunnan hyvinvointialue
Description
Rakennamme Satakunnasta hyvän olon edelläkävijän edistämällä satakuntalaisten hyvinvointia, turvallisuutta ja terveyttä kaikilla tasoilla.
Key services
Terveyspalvelut, Sosiaalipalvelut, Erityis- ja sairaalapalvelut, Ikääntyneiden palvelut, Lasten, nuorten ja perheiden palvelut, Palveluseteliasiakkaat, Pelastuslaitos, Päihde- ja mielenterveys, Suun terveydenhuolto, Vammaispalvelut
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, React Aria, Matomo Analytics, Ninchat, Rechanneld Widget
Frameworks
React, WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No DNSSEC
  • Cookie consent implemented
  • No exposed emails or phone numbers in raw HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
Ninchat, Rechanneld
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Content is in Finnish with some English support pages
  3. Uses WordPress CMS with modern frontend technologies
  4. Implements cookie consent and privacy policy consistent with GDPR
  5. No direct company emails or phone numbers found in raw HTML, but contact forms and address info present
  6. No explicit security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
  7. Uses Matomo for analytics, indicating privacy-conscious tracking
  8. No suspicious external domains or links detected
  9. Site is professionally designed and well-structured
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by WordPress CMS with React-based frontend components, indicating a modern and flexible technical infrastructure. It integrates third-party services such as Ninchat for chat support, Matomo for analytics, and Rechanneld for widget functionality. The site is mobile-optimized with good accessibility features and SEO meta tags. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization in loading speed. The technical stack is well-maintained with no visible deprecated or vulnerable libraries. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional and user-friendly experience aligned with the organization's public service mission.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with satakunnanhyvinvointialue.fi. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review satakunnanhyvinvointialue.fi.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.