Skip to main content

Security report for saratica.cz

Kofola a.s. · Retail · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 3 other checks.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Šaratica.cz is a commercial website promoting Šaratica, a natural mineral water rich in magnesium, known for its laxative and detoxifying properties. The product targets individuals with digestive issues, constipation, and those pursuing a healthy lifestyle, including pregnant women. The website is operated by Kofola a.s., a medium-sized Czech company with a long-standing product history dating back to 1896. The site offers multilingual support and detailed product information, including dosing and historical context.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of saratica.cz. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching saratica.cz

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
30
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
73
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention saratica.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for saratica.cz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions Šaratica as a premium natural health product with a strong heritage and regional significance. Its business model revolves around retail sales of mineral water with health benefits. The website supports customer engagement through contact details and downloadable product literature. The presence of Kofola a.s. as the parent company indicates a stable corporate backing. The market focus is on health-conscious consumers in the Czech Republic and neighboring regions.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and standard security practices, including cookie consent mechanisms compliant with GDPR. It uses Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking, with no detected vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy are not evident, and no security.txt or incident response contacts are published. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be enhanced with additional headers and formal vulnerability disclosure.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a Content-Security-Policy header to mitigate XSS and related attacks.
  2. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  3. Add visible links to privacy and security policies in the website footer for transparency.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.
  5. Regularly update third-party libraries to the latest secure versions.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Kofola a.s.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Kofola a.s.
Description
Šaratica je přírodní zdroj hořčíku, minerální voda pomáhající při zácpě, zažívání, hubnutí a detoxikaci organismu.
Key services
prodej minerální vody, podpora zdraví zažívacího traktu, detoxikace organismu
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, jQuery UI, fullPage.js, Fancybox, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics
Frameworks
jQuery UI
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a commercial site for Šaratica mineral water, a natural laxative product.
  2. Content is in Czech with multilingual options available.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with multi-language support.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided with phone, email, and physical address.
  5. No visible forms collecting personal data on main pages.
  6. No explicit privacy or security certifications displayed.
  7. Use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking.
  8. No signs of security blocking or WAF challenges.
  9. Website uses modern JS libraries but no major frameworks detected.
  10. Good SEO metadata and structured content for user experience.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a traditional jQuery-based tech stack with plugins like fullPage.js and Fancybox for UI effects. Google Tag Manager and Analytics are integrated for marketing and tracking. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile devices, with good SEO metadata. Hosting appears to be managed via the registrar Gransy. There is no evidence of a modern CMS or framework, indicating a custom or legacy implementation. Technical risks are low but modernization could improve maintainability and security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 53/100Medium30 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with saratica.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review saratica.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.