Skip to main content

Security report for sarajevo.travel

Fondacija Sarajevo Navigator · Hospitality · Bosnia and Herzegovina

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Fondacija Sarajevo Navigator operates the official Destination Sarajevo Guide website, providing comprehensive tourism information including events, accommodations, sightseeing, and activities in Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina. The website serves as a key resource for tourists planning visits, offering detailed guides, booking integration, and cultural insights. The business is positioned as an authoritative local tourism promoter with a small organizational size and a focus on hospitality and cultural tourism. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies such as Bootstrap, jQuery, and integrates multiple analytics and advertising services including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Hotjar. The site is mobile-optimized and well-structured, with good SEO practices and consistent branding. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and domain transfer protections, but lacks DNSSEC and some security headers. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sarajevo.travel

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
45
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website targets tourists and visitors interested in Sarajevo, offering a business model centered on tourism promotion and information dissemination. Revenue streams likely include affiliate commissions from accommodation bookings (e.g., Booking.com) and advertising. The site maintains a strong partnership ecosystem with major platforms like Booking.com and social media channels. Growth indicators include active event listings and cultural content updates. The organization leverages structured data and social media to enhance visibility and engagement. Competitive advantages include official status and comprehensive local content. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to improve compliance and security transparency to strengthen market trust.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate. HTTPS is enforced, and domain transfer is protected, but DNSSEC is not enabled, which could expose the domain to DNS spoofing risks. The absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response contacts are published, limiting transparency and readiness. The extensive use of third-party tracking and advertising scripts increases the attack surface and privacy risks. Compliance gaps exist in privacy and cookie policy disclosures, which may affect GDPR adherence. Overall, the security culture appears functional but could be improved by adopting best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to enhance domain security and prevent DNS spoofing.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  3. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  4. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Review and minimize third-party tracking scripts to reduce privacy risks and improve user trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Fondacija Sarajevo Navigator
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Fondacija Sarajevo Navigator
Description
Plan a trip to Sarajevo with the help of the Destination Sarajevo Guide. Find out what to do, where to go, what the must-see attractions are and find all the relevant information visitors might need.
Key services
Tourist information, Event listings, Accommodation booking, Sightseeing and activities guide
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, FontAwesome, jQuery, Owl Carousel, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • Use of Cloudflare DNS

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ad Manager, DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar
Marketing tools
Facebook SDK
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found in the provided content.
  3. Strong use of structured data and social media integration.
  4. Use of multiple tracking and advertising technologies.
  5. No visible security.txt or incident response contacts.
  6. Domain WHOIS uses privacy protection but is consistent with business type.
  7. Good branding and professional design.
  8. Booking.com affiliate integration for accommodation booking.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and popular technology stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, FontAwesome for icons, and Owl Carousel for interactive content display. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Hotjar, indicating a mature digital marketing approach. Hosting appears to leverage Cloudflare DNS services, enhancing availability and performance. The site is mobile-optimized with good navigation clarity and SEO metadata. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in loading speed and accessibility. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party scripts and lack of some security headers, which could impact security and privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sarajevo.travel. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sarajevo.travel.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.