Skip to main content

Security report for saolta.ie

Saolta University Health Care Group · Healthcare · Ireland

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Saolta University Health Care Group is a prominent healthcare organization in Ireland comprising multiple university hospitals. It operates in partnership with the Health Service Executive (HSE) and provides a wide range of clinical services, research, and teaching. The website reflects a mature digital presence with clear navigation, relevant content for patients, visitors, and healthcare professionals, and strong branding consistency. The organization targets patients, general practitioners, and the public, emphasizing quality care and community health services. Technically, the website is built on Drupal 7 with a modern JavaScript stack including jQuery and Google Analytics for user tracking. The site is mobile optimized, accessible, and implements cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR requirements. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and privacy-conscious analytics configurations, though explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not published. Overall, the website demonstrates a professional and trustworthy online presence suitable for a large healthcare provider. The lack of WHOIS data limits domain registration verification, but the content and official partnerships strongly support legitimacy. Strategic improvements include publishing formal security and incident response policies and enhancing HTTP security headers to further strengthen security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching saolta.ie

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
40
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Saolta University Health Care Group holds a significant position in the Irish healthcare sector as a large public healthcare provider. Its business model is centered on delivering equitable healthcare services through multiple university hospitals, supported by clinical research and education. The organization benefits from its partnership with the HSE, which enhances its credibility and operational scope. The website indicates active engagement with patients and healthcare professionals through detailed service information, news updates, and social media channels. Growth indicators include recent news about service expansions and community health initiatives. The partnership ecosystem includes direct links to HSE domains and social media platforms, reinforcing its public sector alignment.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with mandatory HTTPS, cookie consent with opt-in mechanisms, and anonymized Google Analytics tracking. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable scripts were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response information, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms represents gaps in transparency and readiness. Security headers beyond HTTPS are not evident, suggesting opportunities for enhancement. The current setup aligns well with GDPR compliance but could be improved by formalizing security governance documentation and providing clear incident reporting channels.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security governance and controls.
  2. Provide explicit incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  5. Regularly update Drupal core and contributed modules to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Saolta University Health Care Group
Description
Saolta University Health Care Group is a healthcare organization comprising multiple university hospitals in Ireland, providing high quality and equitable healthcare services, clinical practice, teaching, and research.
Key services
Hospital care, Clinical research and development, Patient appointments and clinics, Community health services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal 7, jQuery 2.2, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, LayerSlider
Frameworks
Drupal
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • IP anonymization in Google Analytics
  • Cookie consent mechanism with opt-in
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented with clear navigation and relevant healthcare information.
  3. Strong privacy and cookie consent mechanisms are implemented.
  4. No WHOIS data available to verify domain registration details.
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response information published.
  6. Use of Google Analytics with IP anonymization indicates privacy awareness.
  7. Social media presence on Twitter, YouTube, and LinkedIn is linked.
  8. Website uses Drupal 7 CMS with several custom and contributed modules.
  9. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities detected in HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal 7, a widely used CMS, with a combination of contributed and custom modules including LayerSlider and EU Cookie Compliance. JavaScript libraries include jQuery 2.2 and Google Analytics scripts with IP anonymization enabled. The site is responsive and includes accessibility features such as skip links and ARIA roles. Performance is moderate, with multiple CSS and JS files loaded, suggesting potential for optimization. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified. The site uses canonical and shortlink meta tags and includes SEO-friendly elements such as descriptive titles and meta viewport settings. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a stable and user-friendly experience but would benefit from modernization and enhanced security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with saolta.ie. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review saolta.ie.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.